Hiro...his tumor was cured by doctors during surgery. The part about the trial and his mother kissing him was his inside, him fighting to stay alive. The right question would be: How can a team of doctors successfully cure him in an emergency operation, when all these specialists before had no idea what to do with him.
Chrysis
August 10th, 2010 5:46 AM
The show cant be canceled. Not yet anyway the season finale was left with many unanswered questions... And the promise that the show will continue to the next season... We are simply curious to find out what will happen... Please dear NBC don't cancel Heroes until it get a proper ending...
Kieran
May 17th, 2010 12:17 PM
How did anyone think that would be a good ending? Ages and ages of introductions and build ups of new characters and side plots, then everyone runs away? Seriously, what. the. fudge.
Heroes biggest fan
May 12th, 2010 11:08 PM
Ok these critics are killing me....Im a big fan of supernatural/science fiction shows, Smallville, Supernatural, of coarse Hereos. The show is about people with super powers trying to keep the world safe, isnt that usually how these supernatural show work? This show is kick-ass and if it gets cancelled then I hope Tim Kring has since enough to take it to another network, that's all it needs anyway is another network.
matt
April 4th, 2010 12:13 PM
The season finale was lame, but the season as a whole had it's moments. It would be nice if the writers would look at some of their strongest episodes from the past (A Company Man, The Cold Snap, etc.) and realize why they worked so well. Basically, those episodes focused on one character throughout the episode and had a beginning middle and end. Basically, making a short story out of the episode vs. these year long story arcs that become more convaluted than the yarn webs on Mohinder's wall. I have no problem having the episodes connect (they should) but it seems the writers get a sense of ADD and forget what is going on when and where (which is apparent by the number of comments mentioning vast plot holes.) The plot holes are insulting to the viewers and make it harder to suspend disbelief in the future any more than the viewer has already been asked to (I am looking at you random Irish girl stuck somewhere in a dystopian future never heard from again.) Now that they have a plethora
RANGARAJAN A L
February 25th, 2010 2:47 AM
Guys - when something is given to you in an an out-of-the-world form please take them with a philosophyical view. many of your Amercian series have plenty of it. Heroes, Dead like me to name a few. For example Hiro leaving Charlie at her old age ( as per her wishes) means " do not medle with things that you would be better left alone " Samual Sullivan's ability leaving with others means " do not depend upon others or simply do not 'leech'" I can go on - So keep your vision on the screen with focus on the inner mind. ( Incdenally I am in India )
mjaine
February 17th, 2010 1:52 AM
First of all, I am a huge Heroes fan. I've watched every episode and I love the series. However, I think that M.L. House has made some good points. I know that it's painfully clear that Heroes has become a hit-or-miss every episode. When you hear yourself wondering 'will it be a good episode today?', you just know that something's wrong.
This season finale was fairly anti-climatic, but it did succeed in making me anticipate the next season. First of all, it seems as if Hiro's horrifying stale love story is OVER. That was one storyline that should've been ended a long time ago. I began dreading the appearance of Hiro and hoping that the loveline would just end and finally, it seems as if my prayers were answered. Secondly, the fight between Claire and her dad seems to finally be over and the writers need to keep it that way. That is if they are actually planning to write out a complete story ahead of time. Honestly, do they actually think that they can BS the story without anyone not
Justin Boofer
February 16th, 2010 12:26 PM
If you hate the show so much why keep watching? i just think your too negative about the show. sure its not the best it has been, but its better than you could do i bet. Im not having a go at you, i agree with alot of what you say but there is only so much you can do with heroes before everything becomes a walking cliche.
yes the carnival heroes are a little easy and quick to agree and could have been rectified by them not believing what they were told, then dreadlock guy showing the truth.
"it's boring. It's painfully, painfully boring." - please stop watching this show then.
i still find enjoyment, frustration and entertainment from this show - just as i do from lost.
but i do think that would be a good ending for the show. unresolved. last fifteen minutes was the best 15 minutes of this season.
remiya
February 14th, 2010 10:59 PM
I'd like to see another several seasons of Heroes. Even though the addition of the carnival cast took a lot of screen time away from the core characters, Samuel was an interesting and complex villain, following the show's recurring theme that no one is all good or all bad. He needed serious therapy to get past his adolescent fantasies--staying fixated on Vanessa and their dream house and a need to be special and powerful instead of doing the psychological work needed to develop emotionally. But I liked the fault line in his character, and the wish to feel important and to "get the girl" coupled with a vulnerability that Robert Knepper communicated very well when his charming-people smile would break away momentarily to an uncertain expression and then resume.
I agree that it seemed strange to bring Hiro, Peter, and Sylar together with Samuel only for a few moments at the end of the episode. But I did like the Peter-Sylar time spent behind the wall and wish it had been stretche
Fading-Dream
February 12th, 2010 6:18 PM
Their main problem is that they are not planning an entire season it seems. Another problem is that they decided some characters should get more screen time than others. Why is Claire the center of the universe? They need to be focusing on the characters, and while they tried, they still failed. I think the problem is they are trying so hard to get back to season 1 standard and storyline greatness that they are afraid to move forward. None of their characters are having closure in any of their problems. Claire still has daddy issues. They did succeed in some parts, such as the thanksgiving scenes at Petrellis. The characters responded naturally.
Heroesfan
February 12th, 2010 1:17 PM
@Mark Not so. Samuel took down an entire Mansion in N.Y. on his own, with no Heroes to draw power from. He also went to TX. on his own and took down the Sherriff's Building. He also took on HRG in the streets of LA on his own.
So why is he completely powerless in the last episode of the season, once the carnies leave? There are still very powerful Heroes all around him. Like Sylar, Peter, Emma and Doyle. It doesn't make sense. He couldn't even get away from the cops at the end.
As far as the Graphic Novel goes, why is it a different ending? You should look at it again. Angela wakes up from the precognitive dream and looks out the window of her high rise and sees something burning and a ton of destruction. There was no burning and destruction in the T.V. show. The carnival was still standing, and not much of anything happened. Just amazing plotholes to fill.
richaldo Rank: New User
February 12th, 2010 1:14 PM
#
I love Heroes. I truely do... But this ending....... seriously was a major dissapointment.
Finally Peter gets a big power, finally Sylar and Peter took on the mighty Samuel... and what happens? They all leg it, they loose their powers and Samuel gets carried off by the Company (who hadn't featured the entire of the series........)
Massive battle in Central park? No.
Finally getting to see what all those Carnies can do? No...
The all just legged it.
Without Nathan, Peter is truely powerless. And his 'one power at a time' trick just plain sucks.
Bring on the next series, a big re-think and some kick ass bad guys. After waiting that long for the ending, i'm just not in a rush to see the next one. If one gets made
And Charlie is old, Hero has nothing to do now..... still, at least he won't wake up in the 1600s....... wtf
Mark
February 12th, 2010 1:05 PM
@Heroesfan firsly, it's because he was trying to do something so large and he didn't have enough power to do that. And if you actually read the GN properly and think, it's a precognitive dream that angela had
ExFan
February 12th, 2010 3:30 AM
The show was great season one. Season two, not so much. Season three an assault to my intelligence. Season four I am gone. I could not watch. Season Five????; moot point. Poor writing and plot lines that stopped abruptly without explanation sent me off to better television viewing. :( What a shame. The show had promise, and there were some good characters ruined by poorly written scripts. Too many wonderful shows get cancelled while poor ones go on and on.... May Heroes rest in peace.
Heroesfan
February 12th, 2010 1:52 AM
Plot Holes. How come Samuel was able to destroy his old home in New York City, when he was there by himself. He again went to a Texas town in the middle of the season, all by himself, and destroyed the Sheriff's office. Yet in the finale he loses all his power, because the carnies leave him. Even though Sylar, Doyle and Peter, not to mention other heroes were still near Samuel. So why was he completely a whimp and powerless. Also the online graphic novel has a different ending. It seems the writers are all over the place.
b
February 11th, 2010 5:45 PM
reboot with one of the five million alternative timelines. scarface peter, bad claire anyone? ELLE AND SYLAR? SYLAR'S BABY? so much good stuff back there, somewhere.
Abby
February 11th, 2010 10:30 AM
You know, I used to scoff at the "if you don't like it, don't watch it comments" but now I'm beginning to think they might be right. If you know this show has been absolute crap since the Season 1 finale but still watch, you are just encouraging NBC to keep it on. NBC isn't reading these reviews, they are looking at the numbers and apparently those aren't low enough for them to figure out that it's time to pull the plug. So, if you want to end the torture, stop watching the show.
WTF!
February 10th, 2010 10:20 PM
What the hell. I used to love coming to this site for news on Heroes. But now all I read is the bitching of some person with only a middle school education. If you don't like the show, get the f*ck gone! Seriously. This all used to be on HeroesFanatic.com and now it's turned into a pissing match to see who can be the biggest bitch about heroes. Go the FUCK away already!
Mark
February 10th, 2010 9:16 PM
You know, maybe you should let someone else review it for a change. You never EVER look at any of the positives. And to me you seem like a very literal person. The dream sequence was meant to be METAPHORICAL. For someone who's meant to write a review, you should really hone up on your literary skills. Didn't you notice the fact that Hiro went into surgery? Or were you too busy thinking up another way to say "I don't like it."
There's been a lot of redemption throughout the volume, you just have to be able to look a bit further than you obviously can.
This wasn't the strongest episode or finale heroes has had, yes I'll admit, but it is one of the best episodes, and this volume has been of the same standard as the first one.
As someone who obviously doesn't like the show, maybe you should pass the job over to someone a little less rude, someone who can actually look at more than just plot and the including of characters and can see more depth to the show.
Guest
February 10th, 2010 5:24 PM
I have two thoughts:
1. The reviewer made some good points, but needs to back off a little. Some people do not analyze every single little detail to death while watching. Some people just use a little imagination and go with it.
2. The reviewer should refrain from making his/her political views known. This isn't a political review, it's an entertainment review. I think the comment made was in very poor taste and was very immature. I'm sure you're thinking I'm a Palin fan...sorry, I'm not.
Deb
February 10th, 2010 4:09 PM
I really do still feel like Heroes can be saved. I enjoy the show (although I mostly enjoy how ridiculous it gets) and still watch it, but I definitely think its been rapidly declining. I think they need to kill off Claire (come on, people, treat her like a vampire and go with the standard decapitation+cremation - why has no one on the show thought of this?), because, frankly, Panettiere is a terrible actress. I was surprised to discover that I actually liked her lesbian girlfriend/roommate (although I rather hoped it would turn out she had powers or something, and that Samuel was using Claire to get to her).
To fix it, they should get some actual, exciting storylines. I mean, we need to fear for our characters' lives here, not just wonder about some random people wandering around central park. They need to have some character development in someone who isn't Sylar (since, apparently, he's the only character on Heroes who is capable of change). They should go back to the
Cory
February 10th, 2010 2:32 PM
There are two HUGE glaring problems with the finale. The first is about Samuel. We see him kill his brother with rock projectiles...with only two specials nearby. We see him sink a mansion...with NO specials nearby. Then he sinks a town of two hundred people again with NO specials nearby. But in the season finale, he couldn't kill a small crowd of people with his ENTIRE family there backstage? And when they vanished he became powerless and helpless even though there were four specials still at the fair at that time!?!?!?!?
Second is Claire's decision to to show the world he truth. Anybody else remember how Nathan tried to do the same thing...and dark Peter from the future caem back and shot him? Or does anyone recall the fact that every dark future they have seen has been a result of the public knowing the secret!? Well apparentl Claire doesn't. It would seem she has no issue with this dark future, as her completely unlogical choice to openly just show off her gift to the world wo
Will
February 10th, 2010 1:18 PM
If there's one thing worth looking forward to next season, it will be the riddance of the 4 season long Noah and Claire "i want to be a hero/i want to keep you safe and hide you" argument.
I REALLY hope that they take it in a different direction after this season. I'd personally like to see some of the future variables come into effect, such as Peter Petrelli the scarfaced fugitive. I think it would be a good idea to make Peter a bit of a tough guy. Season 1 pretty much evolved around him and all we have been treated to since then is a constant stream of bad decisions and "who am i, what am i meant to do"
Please Mr Kring, NO new characters. No more "i don't know who i am, what does this mean" etc. More story, more action, and more relevance please.
Derek
February 10th, 2010 10:35 AM
However, "Who was redeemed" is a damn good question. Sylar is the only character who got redeemed, and he had close to nothing to do with the main plot until the end of the season. It sounds like the writers flip flopped on the story again. There was probably more redemption planned... But Tim Kring has said that they only plan a few episodes in advance, and alter the story to appease themselves, fans, and NBC. Absolutely ridiculous...
Derek
February 10th, 2010 10:31 AM
I'd like to point out that Ando's power was originally introduced as super charging other people's abilities back in season 3, and then that ability also developed into... zapping stuff... later on. So, yeah. Not a plot hole.
Sylar: I can't bring Nathan back Peter, but I can sure as Hell swing a sledgehammer.
September 17th, 2010 2:12 PM
Hiro...his tumor was cured by doctors during surgery. The part about the trial and his mother kissing him was his inside, him fighting to stay alive. The right question would be: How can a team of doctors successfully cure him in an emergency operation, when all these specialists before had no idea what to do with him.
August 10th, 2010 5:46 AM
The show cant be canceled. Not yet anyway the season finale was left with many unanswered questions... And the promise that the show will continue to the next season... We are simply curious to find out what will happen... Please dear NBC don't cancel Heroes until it get a proper ending...
May 17th, 2010 12:17 PM
How did anyone think that would be a good ending? Ages and ages of introductions and build ups of new characters and side plots, then everyone runs away? Seriously, what. the. fudge.
May 12th, 2010 11:08 PM
Ok these critics are killing me....Im a big fan of supernatural/science fiction shows, Smallville, Supernatural, of coarse Hereos. The show is about people with super powers trying to keep the world safe, isnt that usually how these supernatural show work? This show is kick-ass and if it gets cancelled then I hope Tim Kring has since enough to take it to another network, that's all it needs anyway is another network.
April 4th, 2010 12:13 PM
The season finale was lame, but the season as a whole had it's moments. It would be nice if the writers would look at some of their strongest episodes from the past (A Company Man, The Cold Snap, etc.) and realize why they worked so well. Basically, those episodes focused on one character throughout the episode and had a beginning middle and end. Basically, making a short story out of the episode vs. these year long story arcs that become more convaluted than the yarn webs on Mohinder's wall. I have no problem having the episodes connect (they should) but it seems the writers get a sense of ADD and forget what is going on when and where (which is apparent by the number of comments mentioning vast plot holes.) The plot holes are insulting to the viewers and make it harder to suspend disbelief in the future any more than the viewer has already been asked to (I am looking at you random Irish girl stuck somewhere in a dystopian future never heard from again.) Now that they have a plethora
February 25th, 2010 2:47 AM
Guys - when something is given to you in an an out-of-the-world form please take them with a philosophyical view. many of your Amercian series have plenty of it. Heroes, Dead like me to name a few. For example Hiro leaving Charlie at her old age ( as per her wishes) means " do not medle with things that you would be better left alone " Samual Sullivan's ability leaving with others means " do not depend upon others or simply do not 'leech'" I can go on - So keep your vision on the screen with focus on the inner mind. ( Incdenally I am in India )
February 17th, 2010 1:52 AM
First of all, I am a huge Heroes fan. I've watched every episode and I love the series. However, I think that M.L. House has made some good points. I know that it's painfully clear that Heroes has become a hit-or-miss every episode. When you hear yourself wondering 'will it be a good episode today?', you just know that something's wrong.
This season finale was fairly anti-climatic, but it did succeed in making me anticipate the next season. First of all, it seems as if Hiro's horrifying stale love story is OVER. That was one storyline that should've been ended a long time ago. I began dreading the appearance of Hiro and hoping that the loveline would just end and finally, it seems as if my prayers were answered. Secondly, the fight between Claire and her dad seems to finally be over and the writers need to keep it that way. That is if they are actually planning to write out a complete story ahead of time. Honestly, do they actually think that they can BS the story without anyone not
February 16th, 2010 12:26 PM
If you hate the show so much why keep watching? i just think your too negative about the show. sure its not the best it has been, but its better than you could do i bet. Im not having a go at you, i agree with alot of what you say but there is only so much you can do with heroes before everything becomes a walking cliche.
yes the carnival heroes are a little easy and quick to agree and could have been rectified by them not believing what they were told, then dreadlock guy showing the truth.
"it's boring. It's painfully, painfully boring." - please stop watching this show then.
i still find enjoyment, frustration and entertainment from this show - just as i do from lost.
but i do think that would be a good ending for the show. unresolved. last fifteen minutes was the best 15 minutes of this season.
February 14th, 2010 10:59 PM
I'd like to see another several seasons of Heroes. Even though the addition of the carnival cast took a lot of screen time away from the core characters, Samuel was an interesting and complex villain, following the show's recurring theme that no one is all good or all bad. He needed serious therapy to get past his adolescent fantasies--staying fixated on Vanessa and their dream house and a need to be special and powerful instead of doing the psychological work needed to develop emotionally. But I liked the fault line in his character, and the wish to feel important and to "get the girl" coupled with a vulnerability that Robert Knepper communicated very well when his charming-people smile would break away momentarily to an uncertain expression and then resume.
I agree that it seemed strange to bring Hiro, Peter, and Sylar together with Samuel only for a few moments at the end of the episode. But I did like the Peter-Sylar time spent behind the wall and wish it had been stretche
February 12th, 2010 6:18 PM
Their main problem is that they are not planning an entire season it seems. Another problem is that they decided some characters should get more screen time than others. Why is Claire the center of the universe? They need to be focusing on the characters, and while they tried, they still failed. I think the problem is they are trying so hard to get back to season 1 standard and storyline greatness that they are afraid to move forward. None of their characters are having closure in any of their problems. Claire still has daddy issues. They did succeed in some parts, such as the thanksgiving scenes at Petrellis. The characters responded naturally.
February 12th, 2010 1:17 PM
@Mark Not so. Samuel took down an entire Mansion in N.Y. on his own, with no Heroes to draw power from. He also went to TX. on his own and took down the Sherriff's Building. He also took on HRG in the streets of LA on his own.
So why is he completely powerless in the last episode of the season, once the carnies leave? There are still very powerful Heroes all around him. Like Sylar, Peter, Emma and Doyle. It doesn't make sense. He couldn't even get away from the cops at the end.
As far as the Graphic Novel goes, why is it a different ending? You should look at it again. Angela wakes up from the precognitive dream and looks out the window of her high rise and sees something burning and a ton of destruction. There was no burning and destruction in the T.V. show. The carnival was still standing, and not much of anything happened. Just amazing plotholes to fill.
Rank: New User
February 12th, 2010 1:14 PM
#
I love Heroes. I truely do... But this ending....... seriously was a major dissapointment.
Finally Peter gets a big power, finally Sylar and Peter took on the mighty Samuel... and what happens? They all leg it, they loose their powers and Samuel gets carried off by the Company (who hadn't featured the entire of the series........)
Massive battle in Central park? No.
Finally getting to see what all those Carnies can do? No...
The all just legged it.
Without Nathan, Peter is truely powerless. And his 'one power at a time' trick just plain sucks.
Bring on the next series, a big re-think and some kick ass bad guys. After waiting that long for the ending, i'm just not in a rush to see the next one. If one gets made
And Charlie is old, Hero has nothing to do now..... still, at least he won't wake up in the 1600s....... wtf
February 12th, 2010 1:05 PM
@Heroesfan firsly, it's because he was trying to do something so large and he didn't have enough power to do that. And if you actually read the GN properly and think, it's a precognitive dream that angela had
February 12th, 2010 3:30 AM
The show was great season one. Season two, not so much. Season three an assault to my intelligence. Season four I am gone. I could not watch. Season Five????; moot point. Poor writing and plot lines that stopped abruptly without explanation sent me off to better television viewing. :( What a shame. The show had promise, and there were some good characters ruined by poorly written scripts. Too many wonderful shows get cancelled while poor ones go on and on.... May Heroes rest in peace.
February 12th, 2010 1:52 AM
Plot Holes. How come Samuel was able to destroy his old home in New York City, when he was there by himself. He again went to a Texas town in the middle of the season, all by himself, and destroyed the Sheriff's office. Yet in the finale he loses all his power, because the carnies leave him. Even though Sylar, Doyle and Peter, not to mention other heroes were still near Samuel. So why was he completely a whimp and powerless. Also the online graphic novel has a different ending. It seems the writers are all over the place.
February 11th, 2010 5:45 PM
reboot with one of the five million alternative timelines. scarface peter, bad claire anyone? ELLE AND SYLAR? SYLAR'S BABY? so much good stuff back there, somewhere.
February 11th, 2010 10:30 AM
You know, I used to scoff at the "if you don't like it, don't watch it comments" but now I'm beginning to think they might be right. If you know this show has been absolute crap since the Season 1 finale but still watch, you are just encouraging NBC to keep it on. NBC isn't reading these reviews, they are looking at the numbers and apparently those aren't low enough for them to figure out that it's time to pull the plug. So, if you want to end the torture, stop watching the show.
February 10th, 2010 10:20 PM
What the hell. I used to love coming to this site for news on Heroes. But now all I read is the bitching of some person with only a middle school education. If you don't like the show, get the f*ck gone! Seriously. This all used to be on HeroesFanatic.com and now it's turned into a pissing match to see who can be the biggest bitch about heroes. Go the FUCK away already!
February 10th, 2010 9:16 PM
You know, maybe you should let someone else review it for a change. You never EVER look at any of the positives. And to me you seem like a very literal person. The dream sequence was meant to be METAPHORICAL. For someone who's meant to write a review, you should really hone up on your literary skills. Didn't you notice the fact that Hiro went into surgery? Or were you too busy thinking up another way to say "I don't like it."
There's been a lot of redemption throughout the volume, you just have to be able to look a bit further than you obviously can.
This wasn't the strongest episode or finale heroes has had, yes I'll admit, but it is one of the best episodes, and this volume has been of the same standard as the first one.
As someone who obviously doesn't like the show, maybe you should pass the job over to someone a little less rude, someone who can actually look at more than just plot and the including of characters and can see more depth to the show.
February 10th, 2010 5:24 PM
I have two thoughts:
1. The reviewer made some good points, but needs to back off a little. Some people do not analyze every single little detail to death while watching. Some people just use a little imagination and go with it.
2. The reviewer should refrain from making his/her political views known. This isn't a political review, it's an entertainment review. I think the comment made was in very poor taste and was very immature. I'm sure you're thinking I'm a Palin fan...sorry, I'm not.
February 10th, 2010 4:09 PM
I really do still feel like Heroes can be saved. I enjoy the show (although I mostly enjoy how ridiculous it gets) and still watch it, but I definitely think its been rapidly declining. I think they need to kill off Claire (come on, people, treat her like a vampire and go with the standard decapitation+cremation - why has no one on the show thought of this?), because, frankly, Panettiere is a terrible actress. I was surprised to discover that I actually liked her lesbian girlfriend/roommate (although I rather hoped it would turn out she had powers or something, and that Samuel was using Claire to get to her).
To fix it, they should get some actual, exciting storylines. I mean, we need to fear for our characters' lives here, not just wonder about some random people wandering around central park. They need to have some character development in someone who isn't Sylar (since, apparently, he's the only character on Heroes who is capable of change). They should go back to the
February 10th, 2010 2:32 PM
There are two HUGE glaring problems with the finale. The first is about Samuel. We see him kill his brother with rock projectiles...with only two specials nearby. We see him sink a mansion...with NO specials nearby. Then he sinks a town of two hundred people again with NO specials nearby. But in the season finale, he couldn't kill a small crowd of people with his ENTIRE family there backstage? And when they vanished he became powerless and helpless even though there were four specials still at the fair at that time!?!?!?!?
Second is Claire's decision to to show the world he truth. Anybody else remember how Nathan tried to do the same thing...and dark Peter from the future caem back and shot him? Or does anyone recall the fact that every dark future they have seen has been a result of the public knowing the secret!? Well apparentl Claire doesn't. It would seem she has no issue with this dark future, as her completely unlogical choice to openly just show off her gift to the world wo
February 10th, 2010 1:18 PM
If there's one thing worth looking forward to next season, it will be the riddance of the 4 season long Noah and Claire "i want to be a hero/i want to keep you safe and hide you" argument.
I REALLY hope that they take it in a different direction after this season. I'd personally like to see some of the future variables come into effect, such as Peter Petrelli the scarfaced fugitive. I think it would be a good idea to make Peter a bit of a tough guy. Season 1 pretty much evolved around him and all we have been treated to since then is a constant stream of bad decisions and "who am i, what am i meant to do"
Please Mr Kring, NO new characters. No more "i don't know who i am, what does this mean" etc. More story, more action, and more relevance please.
February 10th, 2010 10:35 AM
However, "Who was redeemed" is a damn good question. Sylar is the only character who got redeemed, and he had close to nothing to do with the main plot until the end of the season. It sounds like the writers flip flopped on the story again. There was probably more redemption planned... But Tim Kring has said that they only plan a few episodes in advance, and alter the story to appease themselves, fans, and NBC. Absolutely ridiculous...
February 10th, 2010 10:31 AM
I'd like to point out that Ando's power was originally introduced as super charging other people's abilities back in season 3, and then that ability also developed into... zapping stuff... later on. So, yeah. Not a plot hole.