David Boreanaz Clarifies Stance on Bones' Booth & Brennan Comments (Page 2)
33 Comments
Carol D
April 9th, 2010 3:39 PM
Please! Bones says she's a scientist and can't get involved with Booth. That makes no sense. The producers/writers have danced this dance too long. Bones is damaged emotionally, but it's time for her to take a chance on Booth. OMG - men like that don't grow on trees honey!
Susan
April 9th, 2010 12:42 PM
Heartbroken doesn't describe the feeling at the end of last nights episode. After 5 years of flirting and near togetherness to have it end with Booth "moving on" is just not right. It's time to let them get together, humanize Bones more, let her see what she is giving up. After the Angela/Hodgins fiasco haven't we learned anything. We all wantto see this relationship blossom, not be teasedd week after week and then have such a lousy ending. Frustration and Tears!!!!!!!!!!
stephanie
April 9th, 2010 10:42 AM
I have to agree with the majority of writers. This ending could be a disaster for the show if they don't come back with a different storyline quickly. Most of us have seen heartbreak in relationships, know the pain of seeing a past love with another as they try to "move on". We have lived it and cannot watch it for entertainment; so to watch a show feeling anothers heartbreak & uncertainty... nope, not fun. Lighthearted flirting that goes no where because the two let everyone know there is no chance because of their love for each... maybe. For awhile. Don't let Booth have another love for even a short time or can kiss this show Good-bye. Sorry FOX, but that's the way these BONES roll!!
Gena
April 9th, 2010 12:56 AM
Get with it already!!!We want to see Booth and Bones together!!!We love the show please don't frustrate the audience and make us change the channel...Give us something already!!!!
Ariana
April 9th, 2010 12:52 AM
I agree with a lot of you...I believe taking it slow is good. but come on it has been 5 seasons....There can be ways that good story lines can be still written and strecthed.Like for example: what happened to bones wanting a baby? They should write in a story line of her becoming pregnant and booth being the donor...With that story line a lot of creative curves can be wrote in..and of course booth and bones ending up together and always being brought together because of what would bind them...not only their love but a child as well. and this would help bones grow to show her emotions and be more expressive..SO GET ON WITH IT!!!!
maria
April 8th, 2010 10:21 PM
are you kidding me? what season is this?? like the 7th? it is really about time that Booth and Brennan get together! I'm sorry but the plot lines are getting dry and the cases seem to be boring and at times much too predictable. i don't like how the show has become completely about the anthropology and nothing about any of the character's personal lives. this is, after all, television. Booth and Brennan are clearly made for each other, and honestly the reason i have been watching this show these past few seasons are in hopes of Booth and Brennan finally getting together. but no such luck apparently. the 100th episode had a clear opening for the relationship between Booth and Brennan. unfortunately, this episode gave many viewers high hopes, only to be crushed. please bring them together! they are clearly made for each other.
Mary
April 8th, 2010 9:49 PM
I watched the 100th episode...I was really upset. But I understand what Bones was saying when she said, "I am just a scientist, I don't change." Over the past few seasons I believe that she has gotten better with just the way she and other people joke around with things, and I can also see how she is getting better at understanding what people say more and more...and I believe that it all has to do with Booth. At point the writers have to have a WHOLE season on Booth and Bones and them together...and maybe eventually them getting married! At least Bones and Booth are now even more open to their relationship and their feelings!
Birgit Elsner
April 8th, 2010 9:27 PM
I did not like the way the 100th episode ended!! I believe it would be much more interesting to see them seeking around in a relationship!! They seem to love each other and now a days we need more of that!!
Thank you,
Birgit
MC
April 7th, 2010 8:33 AM
The opening comments are completely uncalled for and unprofessional. Whatever David Boreanaz does or does not do in his private life is nobody's business. The fans don't know David Boreanaz and neither do you. The fans want to hear about his work and in particular about the work he does on Bones and the wonderful way he and Emily Deschanel portray Booth and Brennan.
You should be ashamed of yourself. You are not a journalist in any sense of the word. You are a complete hack. You deserve all the censure you receive.
T
April 5th, 2010 5:35 PM
You know, there are things that will make fans stop reading this site and this is among those things for sure. I don't know who thought that that magazine could be used as a source of information, but whoever did should consider getting a new 'job' - and fast. Maybe someone is looking for a fabulist.....that could work out..... Anyway it's sad to see a fairly normal and on times even good site turn into a gossip page and trying to help creating a stepping stone for wannabe-stars like this Rachel.....
Nelly
April 1st, 2010 12:21 AM
Seriously? You clearly already have a strong fan base and by writing such garbage as that intro all you will do is alienate them and invite a different type of audience. But please, leave David Boreanaz, out of this. He's not some reality TV star looking to get his 15 minutes of fame. He's earned his stripes the hard way.
dodson
March 31st, 2010 9:55 AM
So TV Fanatic is a sleeze celebrity gossip site now?
Wow. I was sorry to see that and will miss your website.
Alexa
March 30th, 2010 6:32 PM
Please revise the intro to the article. It's uncalled for, inappropriate and just plain rude. As a reviewer, i believe you should respect David as an actor and as a person. His business is his business and shouldn't be associated with his acting career. I wouldn't be surprised, much less care at all, if Fox halted your access to future episodes for future reviews.
K.
March 30th, 2010 4:23 PM
The first part of this article was completely inappropriate. If you have any professionalism at all, you would revise it sooner rather than later. Just commenting to let you know that this is the last time I will be looking at this website because of the outrageously rude content I found.
Barb
March 30th, 2010 2:22 PM
Totally inappropriate lead in this article. I wouldn't be surprised if Fox denies you access in the future to any interviews, and if other networks are alert, they will do the same.
Shelly
March 30th, 2010 12:32 PM
In total agreement with most comments here.
The first statement adds nothing to the article and David's been a TV working actor for almost 15 years.
Esra
March 30th, 2010 12:18 PM
What a stupid comment " * Being the married guy Rachel Uchitel slept with before Tiger Woods
* Being half of Bones' sizzling and electric Booth-Brennan component"..what is this?
He's been working through the years to become David Boreanaz.This can't be easy to say that's all..Where is Buffy?Where is angel and all the good stuff?
sahem on you
CB
March 30th, 2010 11:50 AM
I was not gonna comment since I don't think this article needs ANY more publicity due to the disrespectfulness but I just had to.
The intro is the mostuncalled for, inappropriate, unnecessary, rude, out of line, disrespectful and distasteful intro I have ever read!
I certainly hope you change it. How can ANYONE use a rumor, a RUMOR (from ONE of the most gossipy source ON THE PLANET), in an intro of something that is real and considered entertainment and where such things are totally unnecessary to be brought up in?
I am blown away by this and not in a good way.
Shame on you!
Mia
March 30th, 2010 11:38 AM
The first part of the article was not needed but I don't know why fans are so upset about it. It's true that a lot of people know him because of that cheating scandal. Anyways David didn't publicly deny the rumor and Rachel pretty much confirmed that she did sleep with him.
Poetic_line
March 30th, 2010 11:28 AM
No need to put in the first allegation. That's dead now and never substantiated. And I don't want it substantiated either.
Just treat David as a working actor and tell us about the show. Thanks.
bkwurm1
March 30th, 2010 11:25 AM
No, he is not famous for anything to do with Uchitel. How about mentioning something he is actually famous for, like his work on Buffy or Angel? What a ridiculuous lead in. Fans of Bones don't need or want that kind of slanderous gossip. I'll skip this site in the future.
me
March 30th, 2010 11:19 AM
The allegations of David so-called cheating were NEVER proved by the 'infamously for being always wrong' Star Magazine. And they were NEVER addressed by the still-very-much-married-with-children David Boreanaz. So why bring up nonsubstantiated rumors in an article about a REAL TV show with REAL statements from an REAL interview with the actor? Just for the love of spreading trashy old allegations? Great quality writing! ;)
amy
March 30th, 2010 11:16 AM
I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt whether or not I should. Please please revise the first part of this article. It is so incredibly disrespectful...and fans of the show could care less about any rumors out there. We love the show...and your mix of show and sensationalism is completely inappropriate for a journalist covering tv.
Brennan: I want to marry you. Will you marry me, Booth? Booth: Are you serious? Brennan: Yes. I've been afraid, I've been stubborn, and I've been in love. An...
April 9th, 2010 3:39 PM
Please! Bones says she's a scientist and can't get involved with Booth. That makes no sense. The producers/writers have danced this dance too long. Bones is damaged emotionally, but it's time for her to take a chance on Booth. OMG - men like that don't grow on trees honey!
April 9th, 2010 12:42 PM
Heartbroken doesn't describe the feeling at the end of last nights episode. After 5 years of flirting and near togetherness to have it end with Booth "moving on" is just not right. It's time to let them get together, humanize Bones more, let her see what she is giving up. After the Angela/Hodgins fiasco haven't we learned anything. We all wantto see this relationship blossom, not be teasedd week after week and then have such a lousy ending. Frustration and Tears!!!!!!!!!!
April 9th, 2010 10:42 AM
I have to agree with the majority of writers. This ending could be a disaster for the show if they don't come back with a different storyline quickly. Most of us have seen heartbreak in relationships, know the pain of seeing a past love with another as they try to "move on". We have lived it and cannot watch it for entertainment; so to watch a show feeling anothers heartbreak & uncertainty... nope, not fun. Lighthearted flirting that goes no where because the two let everyone know there is no chance because of their love for each... maybe. For awhile. Don't let Booth have another love for even a short time or can kiss this show Good-bye. Sorry FOX, but that's the way these BONES roll!!
April 9th, 2010 12:56 AM
Get with it already!!!We want to see Booth and Bones together!!!We love the show please don't frustrate the audience and make us change the channel...Give us something already!!!!
April 9th, 2010 12:52 AM
I agree with a lot of you...I believe taking it slow is good. but come on it has been 5 seasons....There can be ways that good story lines can be still written and strecthed.Like for example: what happened to bones wanting a baby? They should write in a story line of her becoming pregnant and booth being the donor...With that story line a lot of creative curves can be wrote in..and of course booth and bones ending up together and always being brought together because of what would bind them...not only their love but a child as well. and this would help bones grow to show her emotions and be more expressive..SO GET ON WITH IT!!!!
April 8th, 2010 10:21 PM
are you kidding me? what season is this?? like the 7th? it is really about time that Booth and Brennan get together! I'm sorry but the plot lines are getting dry and the cases seem to be boring and at times much too predictable. i don't like how the show has become completely about the anthropology and nothing about any of the character's personal lives. this is, after all, television. Booth and Brennan are clearly made for each other, and honestly the reason i have been watching this show these past few seasons are in hopes of Booth and Brennan finally getting together. but no such luck apparently. the 100th episode had a clear opening for the relationship between Booth and Brennan. unfortunately, this episode gave many viewers high hopes, only to be crushed. please bring them together! they are clearly made for each other.
April 8th, 2010 9:49 PM
I watched the 100th episode...I was really upset. But I understand what Bones was saying when she said, "I am just a scientist, I don't change." Over the past few seasons I believe that she has gotten better with just the way she and other people joke around with things, and I can also see how she is getting better at understanding what people say more and more...and I believe that it all has to do with Booth. At point the writers have to have a WHOLE season on Booth and Bones and them together...and maybe eventually them getting married! At least Bones and Booth are now even more open to their relationship and their feelings!
April 8th, 2010 9:27 PM
I did not like the way the 100th episode ended!! I believe it would be much more interesting to see them seeking around in a relationship!! They seem to love each other and now a days we need more of that!!
Thank you,
Birgit
April 7th, 2010 8:33 AM
The opening comments are completely uncalled for and unprofessional. Whatever David Boreanaz does or does not do in his private life is nobody's business. The fans don't know David Boreanaz and neither do you. The fans want to hear about his work and in particular about the work he does on Bones and the wonderful way he and Emily Deschanel portray Booth and Brennan.
You should be ashamed of yourself. You are not a journalist in any sense of the word. You are a complete hack. You deserve all the censure you receive.
April 5th, 2010 5:35 PM
You know, there are things that will make fans stop reading this site and this is among those things for sure. I don't know who thought that that magazine could be used as a source of information, but whoever did should consider getting a new 'job' - and fast. Maybe someone is looking for a fabulist.....that could work out..... Anyway it's sad to see a fairly normal and on times even good site turn into a gossip page and trying to help creating a stepping stone for wannabe-stars like this Rachel.....
April 1st, 2010 12:21 AM
Seriously? You clearly already have a strong fan base and by writing such garbage as that intro all you will do is alienate them and invite a different type of audience. But please, leave David Boreanaz, out of this. He's not some reality TV star looking to get his 15 minutes of fame. He's earned his stripes the hard way.
March 31st, 2010 9:55 AM
So TV Fanatic is a sleeze celebrity gossip site now?
Wow. I was sorry to see that and will miss your website.
March 30th, 2010 6:32 PM
Please revise the intro to the article. It's uncalled for, inappropriate and just plain rude. As a reviewer, i believe you should respect David as an actor and as a person. His business is his business and shouldn't be associated with his acting career. I wouldn't be surprised, much less care at all, if Fox halted your access to future episodes for future reviews.
March 30th, 2010 4:23 PM
The first part of this article was completely inappropriate. If you have any professionalism at all, you would revise it sooner rather than later. Just commenting to let you know that this is the last time I will be looking at this website because of the outrageously rude content I found.
March 30th, 2010 2:22 PM
Totally inappropriate lead in this article. I wouldn't be surprised if Fox denies you access in the future to any interviews, and if other networks are alert, they will do the same.
March 30th, 2010 12:32 PM
In total agreement with most comments here.
The first statement adds nothing to the article and David's been a TV working actor for almost 15 years.
March 30th, 2010 12:18 PM
What a stupid comment " * Being the married guy Rachel Uchitel slept with before Tiger Woods
* Being half of Bones' sizzling and electric Booth-Brennan component"..what is this?
He's been working through the years to become David Boreanaz.This can't be easy to say that's all..Where is Buffy?Where is angel and all the good stuff?
sahem on you
March 30th, 2010 11:50 AM
I was not gonna comment since I don't think this article needs ANY more publicity due to the disrespectfulness but I just had to.
The intro is the most uncalled for, inappropriate, unnecessary, rude, out of line, disrespectful and distasteful intro I have ever read!
I certainly hope you change it. How can ANYONE use a rumor, a RUMOR (from ONE of the most gossipy source ON THE PLANET), in an intro of something that is real and considered entertainment and where such things are totally unnecessary to be brought up in?
I am blown away by this and not in a good way.
Shame on you!
March 30th, 2010 11:38 AM
The first part of the article was not needed but I don't know why fans are so upset about it. It's true that a lot of people know him because of that cheating scandal. Anyways David didn't publicly deny the rumor and Rachel pretty much confirmed that she did sleep with him.
March 30th, 2010 11:28 AM
No need to put in the first allegation. That's dead now and never substantiated. And I don't want it substantiated either.
Just treat David as a working actor and tell us about the show. Thanks.
March 30th, 2010 11:25 AM
No, he is not famous for anything to do with Uchitel. How about mentioning something he is actually famous for, like his work on Buffy or Angel? What a ridiculuous lead in. Fans of Bones don't need or want that kind of slanderous gossip. I'll skip this site in the future.
March 30th, 2010 11:19 AM
The allegations of David so-called cheating were NEVER proved by the 'infamously for being always wrong' Star Magazine. And they were NEVER addressed by the still-very-much-married-with-children David Boreanaz. So why bring up nonsubstantiated rumors in an article about a REAL TV show with REAL statements from an REAL interview with the actor? Just for the love of spreading trashy old allegations? Great quality writing! ;)
March 30th, 2010 11:16 AM
I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt whether or not I should. Please please revise the first part of this article. It is so incredibly disrespectful...and fans of the show could care less about any rumors out there. We love the show...and your mix of show and sensationalism is completely inappropriate for a journalist covering tv.