NCIS: Los Angeles > Peter Cambor on NCIS: Los Angeles Future: It's a Mystery! > Comments Page 2
I loved the realism Peter Cambor brought to his character. Having grown up with a parent in the psychology field, I think the personality he gives his character is very much typical of someone in that field. It seemed genuine. Also, I liked the profiling aspect of each case that is now missing in each episode. It was one of the things that made this show different from the original NCIS. The new short girl has got to go! No, no no, she is way too annoying and not even close to filling the shoes of Nate Getz. Bring Nate Back!
The only advantage to the loss of the character Nate is that now Peter knows that despite the small bones the powers that be threw him; the fans recognized and appreciated his talent and ability. Peter should find a show that will use and appreciate his abilities and then tell NCIS - LA to kiss-off and laugh as their fan base dwindles.
I do miss Nate's role. Though he's not an agent, he's a good psychologist. He's really important, and he has good interactions with others!How let he go? Now his role has some changes (turns into a greater agent or something? with a mission) I do wish to see Nate again!
I love Nate! Bring him back FULL TIME not this "special guest star".
It give him something to do I say go for it
Please bring Nate back-donot like the new girl.
Please do not take Peter off the show; really enjoy Nate he adds lots to the show.
I think if the writers had given him more 'meat' to a story line it would have worked out better for the actor. Unfortunately, his position was too vague. His position was never utilized. On the other hand, the character of the new guy (the LA cop) has already been established as part of the team.
I disagree with the comments that peter cambor's role was anything but someone who took up space.What did he add to the show or any story line?Nothing.All his character did was stand adround and stare.The writers never did give him any substance to his role.Compare NCIS LA to NCIS.Everyone on NCIS is sharply defined.My only criticism is give Jimmy more air time.He's so very good!On ncis la, Cambor never did have any real contribution to the story lines.Just my opinion.
Here we go again. The kiss of death befalls NICIS-LA as it did House and every other good show. Why do writers coninually shoot themselves in the foot? Stop tinkering with a winning formula. Nate was a critical part of the team. When he is gone, so is my loyalty to the show
I liked the program the was it was. Loved Peter Cambor's role. Very disappointed in the vague storyline. Why do producers change things when everything is going great?
You are posting as a guest. To post as a user, please Login or Register.
Remember My Info