Tuesdays 8:00 PM on FOX
Glee

Glee Review: Let's Hear It for Love!

by at . Comments

As you might expect on a Valentine's Day-themed episode titled "Heart," Glee sent a message to viewers this week: Love conquers all.

Even eye injuries. Even scheming parents. Even long-held religious beliefs.

The only problem with the installment? We never actually saw what love had to conquer. Indeed, Glee skipped over every possible tense moment or conversation and just cut right to the sweet stuff, eventually concluding, appropriately enough, in The Sugar Shack.

Rachel's Dads

Rachel and Finn get into a legitimate argument over cohabitating and possibly rushing into marriage before knowing important traits about each other? Eh, why bother showing us how this couple actually moved past the disagreement and cut to them in bed. It's Valentine's Day after all!

Mercedes breaks the heart of her boyfriend, to the point that she can't even be with the person she loves so dearly and it forces her to sing the world's saddest, most emotional ballad? Eh, why actually depict her chat with Shane? There's a song to sell on iTunes!

Joe - a character we're introduced to and who instantly anchors the heavy, profound topic of Christianity versus homosexuality - is initially hesitant to sing for a gay couple? Eh, why depict any kind of struggle or realization? Let's just have him get over it and croon!

As it so often does, Glee tossed out a number of potentially intriguing storylines here... only to simply skip past any kind of build-up or earned resolution in lieu of as many songs as it could squeeze into an hour. These people aren't characters any more; they're just a set of vocal chords and limbs, uttering a few lines of dialogue to try and set a tone before jumping into their next cover.

I really do not want this to turn into a biblical debate - please be respectful in the Comments - but allow me to say/ask this: Almost everyone who still loves Glee tells me the same thing: Relax. Lighten up. It's frickin Glee! It's not meant to be taken seriously!!! Now... I have never bought into that because Ryan Murphy has made it clear he DOES intend for Glee to have an impact on society (see Kurt, bullying storyline).

But let's say one accepts the premise that Glee is meant to be taken as nothing but mindless entertainment -- in that case, is it really appropriate to actually delve into Christianity and homosexuality? To throw around bible quotes and interpretations? That goes to the heart of my constant issue with the show; it's anything BUT mindless entertainment. It brings up MAJOR issues, yet doesn't take them seriously, or doesn't follow through on them, or wraps them up in a corny, unrealistic, obvious way (hey, let's make the high school bully gay, and then let's make him fall for Kurt!).

The response from Gleeks to my criticism should not be for me to relax; it should be for the series itself to relax and actually air light, fluffy, meaningless episodes, not ones that tackle religion, sex, marriage and monogamy. Glee wants to come across like its profound by touching on various buzzwords and topics - but then it just gives up and solves everything with a song.

Were there aspects of this episode I enjoyed? Absolutely.

I'll take as much Jeff Goldblum as I can get and I hope this isn't the last we see of Rachel's dads. Forget couple's nicknames, they formed the first ever family nickname in television history: HudsonHummelBerry. (Sounds like a Ben & Jerry's flavor I'd totally eat.) They also sort of stole Ellen DeGeneres' motto with Honesty. Respect. Dance. But I'll let it slide.

I laughed at Kurt asking if all Irish people carry around four-leaf clovers, and at Puck asking Rachel when the baby was due. Figgins made me chuckle with his "Finchel" reference and Sugar was also funny here and there, but like the food item after which she's named, this character is much better in doses.

There was far too much of her here, as well as far too much of many characters we barely know. Sugar. Joe. Karofsky. They all received a lot more screen time than Puck, Mike, Tina and Will, not to mention Emma, Sue and Beiste, who didn't even make an appearance, even though one of them is engaged, another is trying to have a baby and another just got married.

You'd think those facts would warrant some Valentine's Day love, wouldn't you?

But that would only be true if Glee was interested in any kind of continuity. When do you think we'll see Karofsky or Joe again? These guys pop in, dominate an hour because the writers conjure up some love theme for their characters and then just disappear for weeks.

And, yes, us viewers know Darren Criss was sidelined so he could briefly appear on How to Succeed in Business Without Really Trying. But Blaine wasn't actually on Broadway. Is there a reason Kurt acted SO shocked at his appearance? Do they not text and/or talk on the phone? Is he not allowed to visit? Why wouldn't Kurt have been aware of his well-being all along?

Is this a small complaint? Of course. But it goes along with the way Glee just insults its viewers by abandoning all semblances of logic.

So, yes, Gleeks, this is another negative review. I loved the performances, especially "Stereo Hearts" and "Cherish," but I fail to see why they can't be combined with consistent storytelling. If you're going to set up conflicts - such as Rachel and Finn's fight, and the God Squad's take on Santana/Brittany - is it really asking too much to depict how those conflicts are overcome?

What did everyone else think? Do you care about conflict resolution or merely about fun songs? Did you feel Mercedes' heartbreak or feel unattached to relationships (with Sam and with Shane) with which we've scarcely spent any time? And do phrases uttered tonight - such as Let's hear it for love! (Will) and That's what being Christian is really about. (Quinn, not long after she tried to set up her baby's adopted mother in a drug sting) - make you want to smile or vomit?

Review

Editor Rating: 2.7 / 5.0
  • 2.7 / 5.0
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
User Rating:

Rating: 4.0 / 5.0 (303 Votes)

Matt Richenthal is the Editor in Chief of TV Fanatic. Follow him on Twitter and on Google+.

Tags: ,
Like Us On Facebook

Want more Glee?

Sign up for our daily newsletter and receive the latest tv news delivered to your inbox for free!

More From TV Fanatic

Dance-moms-season-4-picture

Dance Moms Review: Two Teams, Twice the Drama

It's select ensemble vs. elite in a dance rematch this week on Dance Moms. Who came home with the victory? Read on to find out!
Exiled-opposition

Tyrant Review: Lion and the Lion Tamer

On tonight's Tyrant, Jamal and the Sheik meet for negotiations. Will they come to an agreement?
Caroles-great-ass

The Real Housewives of New York City Review: Delusional Divas

It's time to reunite on The Real Housewives of New York City. Read all about this special episode now.
Annie-gets-an-invite

Covert Affairs Review: To Trust or Not

Who can be trusted? On tonight's Covert Affairs, it's clear that it's important to trust others, but also a huge gamble.

Avatar

Say, here's an interesting question: Why is Sugar still on the show? When we last heard her sing, she couldn't and this was the first time since joining New Directions that she even featured in a story arc. What exactly do they plan to do with her character?

Avatar

I really enjoyed this episode.
Anyway, after reading your review, I saw things in a different perspective. It would be nice if they put into words the resolution of some conflicts, but that would be a different choice of storytelling. I mean, there are many ways to write en episode. For ex., I guess they decided to overlook the make up talk between Finn and Rachel, cause it was more effective to show them as these 2 highschool lovebirds who fight about nothing and make peace with a kiss. Is anyone seriuosly thinking that the writers root for them to get married? I bet we will have more serious on screen talks soon enough. I agree with you most of the time and respect your opinion on this episode, it made me reevaluating mine. But at last, I loved this Glee Valentine, for once I haven't felt disappointed or uncomfortable...ehm, except for the HummelHudsonBerry dinner party, but then, the more awkward it was, the more hilarious! I'd kill to be add to the next guestlist!

Avatar

I like Matt Richenthal review on Glee, I think it's refreshing and absolutely true. I keep watching the show because of loyalty and to see what Matt has to say about it. Glee was refreshing and unique in season 1, now glee feels like a poorly made after school special. I wanted to see how Finchel made up and I wanted to see more challenges for Santana and Britney. I know a lot of comments are about just enjoying the musical because it's fun, watching Glee has been depressing. How this show went from overcoming the difficulties in a teenagers life to life being easy and one big Disney movie, all you need is Love.
I will continue to read reviews from Matt Richenthal cause I enjoy the honesty.

Matt-richenthal

@keyla: I bring up Glee's ratings not because they are low, but because of how much they have dropped. It's a response to those who somehow think I'm simply being anti-Glee, as if I'm alone in my criticism, when it's clear that a LARGE portion of Glee viewers from the past have stopped watching.

Avatar

This review really makes me sad. I don't know why the writer keeps insisting to write Glee reviews when we can totally see his hatred and his disappointment. You should write about something you love. No need to keep messing with the Glee fans, maybe you find it entertaining poking us with a bad review.
And stop bringing up the 'low rating' as an excuse. You brought that up like every episode as "defense". So what if the rating's low? You did know about CW right? Rating's horrible but that doesn't mean those shows are bad.

Soapjunk

I enjoy the musical numbers, and loved the whole episode

Avatar

@ Laura Honestly, it's less to do with the reviewer himself and more that we have to keep reading it. Week after week, the same negative reviews get thrown out. Look maybe he should split it up into sections, good, bad and other so it doesn't seem the entire review is negative. The glee writers are very annoying, we get that. They seem to decide what happens in the episode by pulling potential plots out of a hat, but a 2.7/5? What is he comparing it too exactly? Because it's not the other glee episodes, this one was way above the last 3.

Avatar

Why are you all hating on the writer of this blog? He was very courteous and even said he wasn't trying to offend. Just express his opinion. People are allowed to express their opinions! Just because you love Glee doesn't mean it's always an amazing show and that it doesn't have crappy episodes. He is being critical as he should be! As someone who used to be a huge Glee fan I stopped watching because there really isn't much plot to the show anymore. It's all about them singing more and more songs and then selling those songs on itunes. What is the point of them even having a show?!

Avatar

@Phil
Brian Mitchell Stokes is black. Not every black person looks like Mercedes...we come in different shades but yes the picture Rachel showed he was much darker which is why the turkey baster and not knowing which one is how biological dad was hilarious to people (even though dark skin people can produce children that look white, my mom and grandmom are that scenario).

Avatar

Well I'm still anoyed by the whole Brittana situation... so what they give some screemtime to them and we are suppose to forget that they have been neglectiong the couple... that the way they treated Brittana is almost discriminatory... THATS BULL, and I agree with the reviwer this has turn out into a show to see how many song they can put in a our...