Alcatraz Review: Out of the Fire, Into the Frying Pan

at . Comments

Alcatraz is trying really hard to be a show like Fringe, Lost or some other mythology-based saga covered in mystery and compelling characters.

The ultimate problem is the series so far has, for the most part, been relatively generic. It's not awful by any means, (although a few episodes have felt overly cliche with plenty of head-scratching moments) but it still hasn't struck that particular level of genre-defining, drawn-out characters. Has anyone really felt overly anxious to find out what happens next?

The drama remains trapped in the unfortunate world of being something that you could possibly tune into when channel surfing, a la whatever Law & Order or CSI episode happens to be on, but won't make you feel compelled to watch because some character is going to make a huge series altering decision.The show still feels average.

Clarence on the Run

If anything, there is plenty of potential, much like your grade school teachers used to say about you when you weren't giving it your all even though they knew you could. And I certainly continue to give credit to the interesting concept of vanishing and reappearing criminals from Alcatraz. It's a cool idea.

Even the plot of "Clarence Montgomery" was an interesting take, focusing on a man who was innocent when he was sent to the prison and ended up becoming a murderer because he watched a subliminal brainwashing movie.

In fact, I truly felt sorry for Clarence. He seemed like a decent guy with a gift for making succulent meals who was convicted of a murder in large part because of the color of his skin. And to top it off, he got caught up in a mini power struggle between the Warden and E.B. Tiller, ending with him visiting the doctor for some electroshock therapy. And voila, it's 50 years later and he can't control when he kills. Luck really was never in his favor.

The episode gave plenty of time for viewers to see this man's struggle, right down to his final moments of anguish and despair at what he had become. I didn't want him to die even when he seemed to be begging to be let go from his vicious cycle. Some great acting from Mahershala Ali to give a convincing portrayal of this conflicted prisoner.

Once again, another mystery popped out of the cells of Alcatraz in that some brainwashing techniques were being used. Why would the Warden want killers? Was he planning to take over the world? Maybe an overzealous thought even for the over animated character, but what if? And let's be real, did anyone actually believe him when he said he did nothing to the blood?

But did I find myself caring about our main trio? Not to the same extent I wanted someone to help Clarence.

Rebecca, Diego and Emerson seem to be just along for the show's ride. It's hard to truly describe them as dimensional characters that excite you, entice you and make you love them. There's not a lot new about them to go off, so the series leaves them to their standard routine actions. Rebecca runs around gun drawn (thankfully she wasn't captured) trying to lead the team. Emerson actually leads the team, but he's still too angry and distant to really want to work with anyone. Then there's Diego, who always knows immediately what bad guy needs to be chased and provides some funny commentary because he's not an action cop.

And that's not bad, they're okay characters. They just haven't had a lot of chances to show why we should like them other than their most basic task of saving the world, one returning Alcatraz prisoner at a time.

In fact, the more the show has progressed, the more that I'd almost rather see the prison back before the convicts disappeared. The Warden, who can be at times a bit cartoonish, pulls it off in a way that I just want to hear his diabolical master plan. Even E.B. Tiller - who seems to be leading towards a power play - brings an interesting dynamic between the two men. I feel more inclined to watch everything taking place in that particular time because that's where the mystery starts, and the characters there have a sense of personality and purpose.

All in all, the episode had certain moments, but there wasn't a wow factor. It was just an average hour of television, another returnee showing up and then dealt with by the end. Hopefully, with three remaining episodes of the season, Alcatraz kicks it into high gear and gives us a grand finale worth talking about and discussing around the local water cooler.


Editor Rating: 3.4 / 5.0
  • 3.4 / 5.0
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
User Rating:

Rating: 3.7 / 5.0 (34 Votes)

Sean McKenna is a TV Fanatic Staff Writer. Follow him on Twitter.


I find it hard to undertand why ALACATRAZ may be cancled becouse viewers felt no emotional involvment with the cast yet all the CSI,S just go on and on and on when there has been next to no development in any of them(Maybe a bit in CSI:NY).I hope ALCATRAZ goes on for at least one more sease.


why dosnt she ask her uncle rey more about what happened on the island like more on her grandfather or the drs the man and the woman dr more on the warden
why did Emerson Hauser age but not Dr. Lucille or the other dr
if they want to know about what the keys open or were the secrete places or on the rock why dont they go look more
they should look into the warden and Tiller go there there stuff on the island


So far I have only watched the first episode and it seemed quite promising but reading these comments it looks as if it will go down the same 'plot stretched out to fill multiples series' root that JJ Abrahams did with lost!


they need to do a few plain and simple background episode where no one is being tracked , present day they should be searching the grounds....the sixties just an into to the prisoners...


(cont.) The three main characters have had very little development, so why should I care what happens to them? The whole subplot with Emerson and his comatose lady love (?) is not capturing my imagination like it should, and I LOVE Sam Neill otherwise. The only character that halfway intrigues me at this point is the warden, and the push-pull with Tiller. THAT is interesting and well-played so far. I just feel this show is lacking...something. PLEASE make me care about these characters and the mystery, or I will be tuning out very soon. And as a result, I will probably go to bed in a better mood on Monday nights. C'mon Alcatraz, step it up. I had faith in you from the first episode. You continue to disappoint.


I hate to say it, but this show is starting to wear on me. Big time. I finally understood last night why it actually has started to feel like a drag to watch Alcatraz. It's just so dang depressing. I keep looking for a little spark of light, a moment of....I don't know....redemption? Contrition? Dark shows with mysterious mythos intrigue me. I don't mind the sinister motivations and the "badness" of the inmates, this was, and is, after all, ALCATRAZ. But week after week of being exposed to the most base human behavior, in more detail than really needed to effectively tell a story, is beating me down in spirit. When I watch the show now, I feel that is is something to be ENDURED, not ENJOYED, and I don't like feeling that way. I have to break this into two parts.


I would rather them focus on old prison than the "prisoner of the week" crap that they do. It just gets old, they keep piling on more questions without ever answering anything, and its annoying me that he only reason i even want to watch this show anymore is to find out whos behind them coming back and how they did it.


I'd like it a lot more if they spent fore than 5 minutes on the mythos and if it wasn't cliched and formulaic.

Tags: ,