Anitraward1

Ok I'm really excited because I think I found some irrefutable proof! What if we change the way we think about the name RED JOHN. What it we turn it into what it confusingly seems to represent, a acronym. Now I wouldn't go here if I didn't have proof for my proof. What is that you ask? In the episode Red Sails the killer of Lorelei's sister was identified as Red John. Red John left what was thought to be his first name on the ground in the warehouse next to the body. If McAllister was identified as Red John, why isn't his first name ROY? His name is Thomas McAllister. Not ROY McAllister. Now let's turn the name ROY into a acronym......... 1) ROY- Rest Of You - meaning community 2) ROY - Re Orient Yourself - meaning community ยป religion Correct me if I'm wrong but wasn't VISUALIZE A FARMING RELIGIOUS COMMUNITY? AND DIDN'T RED JOHN USE THIS IDENTIFIER IN HIS EARLY DAYS BEFORE HE USED THE SMILEY FACE SYMBOL? Now let's look at the word VISUALIZE as a HYPERNYM. DEFINITION: Alter, change, modify, cause to change; cause to transform. Now let's look at a VISUAL ID.............. VISUAL ID'S are a very clever idea to help the user tell files apart: they produce images from names of files to produce visually similar (but distinct) Icons for files with similar names. Since they are based on data and are visual, they could be a visualization but they also fail the readability test, you can't tell which image represents which file name. 1) coded file list that repeats itself but represents cell members names. 2) tyger, tyger being used as a identifier and a signifier. 3) different people seeming to be different But representing one man or symbol. Now let's look at the Red John name as a acronym. Let's change the first name RED to a anagramish acronym. RED - ERD. WHAT DOES THIS STAND FOR? Entity- Relationship Diagrams (ERD) DEFINITION: An Entity- Relationship Diagram is a data modeling technique that creates a graphical representation of the entities, and the relationships between entities, within an information system. The three main components of an ERD are: 1) The ENTITY 2) The RELATIONSHIP is the interaction between the ENTITIES 3) The CARDINALITY defines the Relationship between the ENTITIES The three CARDINAL RELATIONSHIPS ARE: 1) ONE TO ONE 2) ONE TO MANY 3) MANY TO MANY J - OINT O - RGANIZATION H - ANDLING N - ETWORK In the

Anitraward1

That's what I was talking about. It doesn't make sense that he did that. I don't think I know of anyone, if they were in that situation that would have done that. A man that has chased you down for ten years says can I show you something AND YOU SAY YES? I would have shot him just for trying that shit. It's stuff like this that lets me know that McAllister wasn't the mastermind behind Red John. I think McAllister was the serial raping killer behind Red John. But the more we turn this thing over it looks like something else was hiding behind that. We have the same thing with the Haibach arc. There are only two entities in the series that have been shown to have the skills to monitor phone lines. 1) Wiley and 2) Van Pelt. Who was always at the computer when all the Red John stuff came in? Van Pelt. Why didn't it come in on anyone else's computer? So for me the inner circle is still in play and McAllister was another sacrificial minion. 1) Carter claimed to be Red John 2) Bertram Claimed to be Red John 3) McAllister claimed to be Red John It seems that they are using the name Red John in a collective manner as if it is an entity unto itself. It's almost like what ever they do, it is claimed in the name of Red John. Its almost like Red John is an organization. 1) tyger, tyger was used for Blake and minions, but in two different ways. One as a signifier and the other as an identifier. But both used with the Red John name. McAllister used it to symbolize his ritualistic killings. 2) Then we have a message, he is man or mar. I'm thinking now it probably means he is many. 3) so is Red John an acronym?

Anitraward1

That's a dam good way to sum it all up. I was thinking the same thing.They are going to do what they're going to do. The analysis was a lot of fun! ๐Ÿ˜ƒ

Anitraward1

These people, lived and died for Red John, there's no understatement, at all.

Anitraward1

Everything that I have stated came from the series. I'm guessing if they are going to clear everything up. Their going back to visualize.Stiles is a dirt bag, I just don't think we've heard the last of him.

Anitraward1

Yep me too! That was so very well stated.

Anitraward1

Here's my question to you Rationalgal, where do you think the mentalist will land when they return. Let's say neither one of us are right. But knowing show formatting, finding the middle ground, where do you think they well go next?

Anitraward1

I would worship him too, if I were an idiot!

Anitraward1

@Rationalgal, I agree that Stiles is not Red John. But he could very well be the suit wearing, tea drinking wealthy, powerful puppeteer behind this whole mess. Alive and well, returning from the dead to fleece the shit out of his congregation for proving that he has the power to overcome death.

Anitraward1

The reason why they had to make Red John bigger then life was to justify the moral imperative. They had to justify Jane's murderous behavior. There was no possible way to make Jane look like a good guy without upping the ante on Red John. To reduce Red John means they also reduce Jane to nothing more than a criminal that has the ability to manipulate the law. So in order to stay the course, they have to reopen the Red John files.

×