i am undecided, i think i like it, i love Eric McCormack. the prob for me is that there are so many shows with the same formula (police/FBI team plus an eccentric yet genius consultant) that it is hard to be really grabbing and original. it reminds me a little of "Monk" slash "the Mentalist". but i am definitely sticking around for now.
it is not Pope, it is impossible. when Gavin did his interviews with the team he said that he figured out that they all share everything amongst each other but not out side. no one from the division would share anything vital with Pope.
my money is on either Gabriel or Tao.
@Kol(Devil in Disguise)-Dande
i don't think they will do it. in the cartoon Tiana lives in the real world not a fairy tale kingdom so there is no world shift for her and also she isn't classic yet, i think they are going for classics only, sth that is also based on books. but i could be wrong.
i really want to see how(and if) they are going to cast Ariel!! i like the choices though that they already made. i am not one hundred percent sold on Aurora yet. i saw her in Tudors and even though she has class and she is attractive i feel like she could have been prettier not to mention younger (Aurora is supposed to be 16, unless she already lived with her prince for quiet some time when the curse came). on the other hand i love Mulan casting!
me too, i would love to see Jasmine! Peter Pan not so much perhaps because i never liked the story as a whole.
a perfect disguise and an argument that cannot be beat in a confrontation. I mean who doesnâ€™t like a changed man, a man that suffered through such a tragedy that all can sympathise with and who is just trying to make peace with his past and do some good and is oh so humbly asking for a second chance! Please! Those crocodile tears will dry soon enough!
â€œI'll start: I have no idea what I believe, but I do believe that whatever it is, Jessica and Harvey brought it on themselves.â€
No they didnâ€™t, if they will not assert their place in the pack now, they will lose the pack and it is a fact. They need to make their play while there is any play left to make. Hardman is a sleaze-ball and he came there to get back at Jessica and Harvey. The guy was embezzling to support his mistress while his wife was on the death bed!!! He was putting their whole firm at risk, what were they supposed to do? Roll over and prepare to die? Then he preferred to hurt his daughter right after her mother died and tell her about the mistress and all rather than give up his play for power! Seriously, he is a douche! His little apology in the end was fake soon he will run out of excuses for the things he does and the gloves will fall. Right now he is just manipulating (or trying to) others using the death of his wife as a perfect disguise and an argument that cannot be beat in a confrontation. I mean who doesnâ€™t like a changed man, a man that suffered through such a tragedy that all can sympathise with and who is just trying to make peace with his past and do some good and is oh so humbly asking for a second chance! Please! Those crocodile tears will dry soon enough!
Last week, Mike mediated a dispute between a publishing company and an employee, forcing them into a settlement and leaving her without credit for work that was hers.
So not true, he got her money which is more than she originally could have hoped for, now if she wanted credit then she should have kept the idea to herself and hired a layer to deal with the legal papers that would protect her copyright. She knew what kind of contract she had with the firm and still flaunted her idea to her boss who she knew was at liberty to use it. She was gullible and thatâ€™s her fault not anyone elseâ€™s. Seriously since when do people actually believe that big firms like that play fair?? I mean come on! Then she didnâ€™t tell everything she wished for to Mike she gave him little bits and thought that she make a power play and draw him in. She got greedy and Mike wouldnâ€™t have it. Well good for him!
....... Well you canâ€™t ask the other side to play a weaker game just because you are weaker than them. That is absurd.
I get that that nurse was fighting a fair cause but it is not Harveyâ€™s job to fight it for them, if they donâ€™t like it, they should spend the money they saved for a strike to hire a pit-bull layer and fight off Harvey.
First off I love whole the writers are building up the tension without letting it explode. Make me wonder just how big the explosion is going to be when it finally comes.
Harvey is brilliant and all this complaining about H&M becoming ruthless? Well about bloody time! They are not running a charity, it is a business , a business of providing a service to their client, of battling g on the behalf of their client. How would you like if your lawyer suddenly decided that what you want is not fair for the other party and started playing you instead of playing for you. They are not judges, they are basically guns for higher and the other party has their own layers to do battle for them and then the judge decides if it fair and square. Like it or not it is how the system works and I donâ€™t see anyone complaining if guys like Harvey are on their side, they are only complaining if the Harveyâ€™s of this world are fighting against them. Well you canâ€™t ask the other side to play a weaker game just because you are weaker than them. That is absurd.
I get that that nurse was fighting a fair cause but it is not Harveyâ€™s job to fight it for them, if they don't like it, they should spend the money they saved for a strike to hire a pit-bull layer and fight off Harvey.
what is up with the Match up? i mean of course the winner is Shane West but to match these two together in a competish is ridiculous!
© 2013 TV Fanatic