i feel like the person who wrote that tries to support the writer's choices, or at least put sense in it, when really (IMO) they didn't have any plan at all.
AL, i totally agree with you.
It's a nice rationalisation for why Chuck might have reacted the way he did, but there's not actually much support for it in the events of the show. A much simpler explanation is that Chuck cannot stand to lose. When he loses (be that the Empire, Eva, Nate finding out about Blair and him in S1) he reacts in a very childish, spiteful and vengeful way to the person he holds responsible: Blair.













