SO THE QUESTION IS …
What do Dan and Blair have in common aside from a common interest in movies and books? After the book is finished, or the movie ends; then what? The only thing that Dan and Blair have over Chuck and Blair is institutionalised education. But what Chuck lacks in book knowledge, he makes up in practical knowledge. Chuck and Blair share so much more than they are given credit for because it has not been paraded before us through contrived dialogue – or “witty banter” if you will. Their affinity is natural and organic and can do without the fanfare.
Chuck and Blair are fictional characters in a story, they are not real people and to relate them to real life situations to make a narrative conclusion is to do a disservice to the storytelling. Clearly their story is one told over the course of 5 seasons; and still ongoing despite this “dair-tour”. Chuck and Blair, Blair and Chuck; the ONLY ending that makes sense.
Actually Chuck plays the piano (2.12) and the Armstrong reference was in 3.09 because they were talking about the debutante ball. I’d point out more of their cultured-ness but it requires a whole list, picspams, dictionary definitions and encyclopedic references. Does anybody want to help me with this? :)
Lol @ the "Dair-Tour"
Posted 3/15/2012 6:23:36 PM
#
