Reply to PostDair fans, why do you prefer them over Chair?
-
"and you can count on FA being sanity? a person who doesnt know to accept other people opinnion and is always acting like he is superior? "
Not accepting others opinions, or acting superior, do not effect your sanity in any way, so what are you trying to get at?
I also still find it hilarious you guys are still on about that, it's kind of cute, it also allows you to completely ignore my arguments, how convenient.
"thank god im not included in the same category of him"
If I was ever to be included in the same category as you, I just might commit suicide.
Posted 10/13/2009 6:11:25 PM # -
I thought it Chuck who followed HER around trying to sabotage her relationship with Marcus. I must've misunderstood. Obviously she had the power in the beginning of s2, and if it wasnt b/c Marcus had an affair with his stepmom, would she have gone back to Chuck???
is this first statement serious? i mean there are so many ways to take it apart. first of all, yeah chuck attempted to sabotage HER relationship with marcus. but don't forget HOW and WHY HER relationship w ith marcus started in the first place. it started because she was coming back to the states and didn't want to be alone. she needed someone random to rub in CHUCK's face. even though by all means she should have done to hell with chuck at that point for leading her on then abandoning her but not blair. not when she's 'in love' anyway. because apparently it means you do weird desperate things to get attention and or prove a point. and if she basically and randomly picked up marcus just to spite chuck, how t he hell does that give HER power? she's proving yet again there's no depth too low that s he won't lower herself to for this guy. and yes, to answer your question i believe she would have gone back to chuck. because in case my initial point was missed, the main reason she was with marcus in the first place was to spite chuck. plus, while dating marcus she still made out with chuck and was damn well aware of who she was kissing on. that was made clear. if the marcus and nasty katherine thing didn't pan out, then i bet blair STILL would have found a way to throw herself at chuck. after season two, she can turn that patheticness into an artform.
Remind me again when Chuck asked her to say ILY by his limo, or Blair ask him to say it by, again, his limo. That's the ILY I'm talking about, not the ones that were asked but never said. They tried to pull the words out of each other's mouths, but it didnt work, until they came out on their own. It may or may not have made sense to you, but the whole "asking" for the ILY in s2 was purely for audience sake, not entirely for character development. It kept us Chair fans still stringing along, whether we enjoyed it or not, so as a writer, the startegy worked.
depends on what you define as strategy. if they were trying to piss off part of the fanbase, delude people and make things as irrelevant as possible, yeah then i guess it did. however, it was pointless and weak. and all it did was prove to all of the great fanfiction writers out there who hated what they saw too that only about a million great thinkers without degrees could pull out better quality than the actual writers. good job!
Blair acts differently with Chuck than she did with other guys. Dan acts the same with every girl he's been with.
i fail to see how acting differently could be put into a positive spin in an argument like this. let me repeat what someone else wrote on here. 'being in love doesn't mean that you change the person you are'. blair acted differently with nate. yeah. she kind of acted the same with marcus though to be honest. i still don't see that as a 'bad' thing and i'm certainly not about to go and declare 'ZOMGS CHUCK HAS SEEN BLAIR'S REAL SIDE SO THEY MUST BE MEANT FOR EACH OTHER AND DESTINED TO LOVE EACH OTHER FOR IONS AND CENTURIES AND LIFE TIMES OMGZ' um no. there's sides, different sides to everyone. yeah i'll admit that chuck bass appeals to more of those sides of blair than those others, but i don't take it to that extreme value. and dan? i take it you're not a dan fan. otherwise you would have noticed how he 'acts'. how he acted with 'sarah' before he knew who she really was wasn't really how he 'acted' with serena. and how he acted with the chipmunk wasn't how he acted with either of them. i don't think that he changed his personality though, i think they were just different situations. either way not the same. and i STILL fail to see what the point in what you said.
And tell me how all of those similarities will be healthy in a relationship? They will agree to disagree???????
i'll just pretend that i didn't read this. because there's no way you can put 'healthy' and 'relationship' in terms of dan and blair but yet attempt to explain how chuck and blair were just the perfect healthy happy couple. cause news flash CHUCK AND BLAIR CIRCA SEASON TWO WAS NOT HEALTHY! anyway moving on...
Dan and georgina are not good references for Dan's case. Even if it wasnt just a coy from the writers to keep us gasping and whispering WTF, then I would say that he had worse judgment than I thought. Even Chuck knew to run away from Georgina. It doesnt mean that he is able to see past all the things he thinks are bad, but just that he's horny and stupid. I'm not saying they can't grow closer as friends, but to jump from that to a relationship, THAT I don't see happening, despite seeing DS, NB, CV, or DG.
it depends on which version of dan and georgina you're talking about. if you mean season one or any variance of dan and georgina before season three, then yeah chuck knew to stay away much like they all knew to stay away from georgina. because georgina is a psychotic crazy bitch who gets her jollies on destroying lives. considering dan didn't know any of these people before serena, then how can you expect him to just magically know that? if you mean dan and georgina season three however, then yeah they are PERFECT references. because dan knew the deal, and he knew all about how wild G could be. yet he did it anyway. if that's not in someway shape or form of declaring just how far D has come along in three years i don't know what is. but i guess the chair side affecting your brain refuses to see certain things. and well i do love to post my opinions, i'm not a miracle worker so we'll keep it at that. go find your own annie sullivan.
but i will say again, if he's coming around to georgina then i definitely don't see how dan and blair couldn't be a possibility.
well then there's no reason for Dair fans to explain how he won't be judgmental anymore since he'll come into new money. Which is why I said that, of course. And like I said, money or no money, he'll still be judgmental. And even if Blair can get Dan to fall for her, which I don't doubt, I don't see her falling for him. The reason for the fighting from Blair's side was because Chuck was worth it to her, and the reason she got the Great Chuck Bass to say ILY, even against the writers' will, is because she was worth it to him.
i don't see how judgement comes into the issue. yeah he's judgemental but so is she. unlike chuck and blair, i don't expect nor want either of them to 'change' for the other person. i just happen to think that the two just as they are, could be pretty compatiable.
crazier things have happened on this show. so i don't see how dan and blair can't happen. i can't help it that there's a bunch of people who fear that it could and too closeminded to even think of the possiblities.
Posted 10/13/2009 6:16:08 PM # -
"On the contrary, Dan could not be anymore WRONG FOR HER! He is everything she can't stand; and vice versa. They could not get along; I wouldn't find their awkwardness after a drunken one night stand 'funny'; but rather....awkward. I don't think as ACTORS they would be able to even make that work. Just face it - Dan and Blair can never and WILL NEVER be anything more than they already are...acquaintences who love to hate each other."
The actors wouldn't be able to make it work? On the contrary, both Leighton and Penn are amazing actors...they could make it work. And how will they never be able to work? Are you a writer??? Do you know for a certain fact that Dair will never happen? I keep on saying this, but Chair aren't going to last forever, at least not on the show. The writers are going to have to break them up to cause some drama. And the smart thing to do would to 1.) Give Blair and Dan a shot, or 2.) Give B lair a new man. And seriously, which one would you rather have? Or hey, we can just put Nate/blair together for the umptenth time. That would be REALLY exciting. Or hey, we can just make Vannessa/Chuck get together again! o,0
And I hate how people say Dair would be horrible when it hasn't even HAPPENED. Who knows, they could be the best thing that has happened to GG...or they could suck. We don't really know what would happen unless the writers give them a chance.
Posted 10/13/2009 6:22:47 PM # -
My god w-t-t-b, ownage to the highest degree.
I bow to you.
"cause news flash CHUCK AND BLAIR CIRCA SEASON TWO WAS NOT HEALTHY!"
They've never really been healthy, ever, and while they've been better on that from so far, they still really aren't, and from spoilers we can see that it'll probably get worse.
"The reason for the fighting from Blair's side was because Chuck was worth it to her, and the reason she got the Great Chuck Bass to say ILY, even against the writers' will, is because she was worth it to him."
Why would it be so hard to believe that not only can Blair fall for Dan, but that she wouldn't go for what she wants if she did? what makes Chuck so much more worthy than Dan? sure if Blair never fell in love with Dan, this post make sense, but why bring it up at all then? when's the last time you fought for someone you didn't love?
You know what'd be a great storyline, Blair and Chuck breaking up(and i'll stop there) and Blair is so hurt over it that she vows never to fall in love again, then her and Dan become close friends at NYU(and again, I won't divulge how, there's no point) and Dan falls in love with her, but can't tell her because he knows how hurt she was because of Chuck and he respects her wishes, it would lead to some great angst, which this show has never done well, but I digress.
Posted 10/13/2009 6:30:30 PM # -
"1.) Give Blair and Dan a shot, or 2.) Give B lair a new man. And seriously, which one would you rather have? Or hey, we can just put Nate/blair together for the umptenth time. That would be REALLY exciting. Or hey, we can just make Vannessa/Chuck get together again! o,0"
I say make Blair single and not want to lean on any man, while Chuck goes back to being the womanizing, king of New York he was once on pace to be, make him have badass storylines as a CEO, and give him his balls back.
Posted 10/13/2009 6:32:18 PM # -
I say make Blair single and not want to lean on any man, while Chuck goes back to being the womanizing, king of New York he was once on pace to be, make him have badass storylines as a CEO, and give him his balls back.
Or yeah, we could do that. lol.
Posted 10/13/2009 6:33:42 PM # -
eh, the writers are shit. they'll fuck up every couple in the end anyway.
Posted 10/13/2009 6:33:57 PM # -
eh, the writers are shit. they'll fuck up every couple in the end anyway.
Amen...except for Vufus and Dilly of course;D
Posted 10/13/2009 6:34:46 PM # -
I say make Blair single and not want to lean on any man, while Chuck goes back to being the womanizing, king of New York he was once on pace to be, make him have badass storylines as a CEO, and give him his balls back.
...we're overthrowing the writers. you can write the show. and Jkay and Mc too, If they ever come back.
Posted 10/13/2009 6:35:48 PM # -
"...we're overthrowing the writers. you can write the show. and Jkay and Mc too, If they ever come back."
I second that motion, hell i'd do that shit for free as long as I could do it out of home, and write this show the way it's supposed to be.
Posted 10/13/2009 6:49:20 PM #
Guest posting is disabled. Click here to login. Click here to register.
Blair: Just because we can't be together doesn't mean I don't love you.
