Law & Order: SVU Season 19 Episode 14 Review: In Loco Parentis

By Jack Ori at

When it comes to sexual assault, defendants are often guilty until proven innocent.

False accusations are rare, but they do happen -- and the taint of a rape accusation can often follow a person for years after the incident.

Law & Order: SVU Season 19 Episode 14 addressed this problem with a dramatic case involving college students, a ton of bad judgment, and Carisi getting caught in the middle when the accuser happened to be his niece.

The whole false accusation issue is a tricky one that could have alienated viewers if not handled properly.

I think it took courage for SVU to address this problem because the suggestion that false accusations could be a problem for the accused could lead down a slippery slope.

It's important not to suggest that most rape victims are lying or that accusers shouldn't be believed, yet it's also important to acknowledge that this problem exists.

Related: Get True Crime Files by ID via Amazon Channels for Over 1,000 Real-life Mystery & Suspense Shows!

I think "In Loco Parentis" did a good job of balancing these issues. 

It wasn't clear what had happened and whether there was a deliberate intent, alcohol-fueled misunderstandings, or what until Mia confessed that she'd made the rape up.

After that, I felt bad for Ethan, but then he raped her for real and became everything of which he had been accused.

And then there was the whole question of whether a rape victim can be credible when she lied in the past about this very issue.

It all kept my interest and kept me guessing about what had really happened when and what was coming next.

As for Carisi, he seemed to make one mistake after another, probably because he was too close to the case.

He should not have been part of the investigation, unofficially or otherwise, and he definitely should not have promised Mia to keep it secret that she had lied about the first incident.

At the very least, he needed to let Stone know so that he wouldn't be blindsided and could prepare his case adequately.

It was nice that Stone forgave him so quickly and prioritized his honesty over the damage the whole thing did to the case, but the fact still remains that Ethan might have walked on the second rape, and that would have partially been Carisi's fault.

As for Stone, I was pretty impressed with his performance in court. It seems like the biggest adjustment he needed to make is expecting a high degree of certainty going in, but once he was actually in the courtroom, his natural abilities took over.

Related: Law & Order SVU Review: The Undiscovered Country

I'm not really a fan of these Perry Mason moments where somebody breaks down on the stand and confesses to something major at the last moment, but since Ethan's confession helped Stone prove himself I'll make an exception for this one.

I loved Benson's explanation of why SVU takes cases to trial. 

I suspect that in real life, rape cases are dropped or pled out every day because the DA doesn't have a winnable case, but I liked the idealistic notion of going to court to give the rape victim the right to confront the rapist whether or not justice will ultimately be served.

This case also showed how poor judgment, impulsive decisions, and putting peers' feelings above the truth -- all hallmarks of teenage and young adult life -- can spiral out of control and have serious consequences.

Mia made an exceedingly poor choice by lying about what happened between her and Ethan in the first place, and she didn't realize that her roommate might care about her enough to report the alleged rape.

If it didn't involve a serious crime with serious consequences, we might chalk her behavior up to inexperience, poor judgment, or just plain stupidity and hope she learns from it.

There were severe consequences for both her and Ethan and even if he hadn't decided to become what he was accused of and rape her for real, neither of their lives would have been the same afterward.

I liked Carisi's firm admonishment of her behavior and his advice to make amends, but after she was raped, I felt like we should have all seen that coming.

Heller was overzealous, and she seemed unaware of the fact that her client had done something wrong in the end, yet she was also right that before the actual rape, his life had been ruined by false accusations that had little merit behind them.

There were no winners here, and Mia did not deserve to be raped because of what she'd done, but I did think there should have been some consequences for her behavior other than a lecture from her uncle and then being ripped apart on the stand.

What did you think of "In Loco Parentis"?

Did you believe Mia before her lie was revealed?

Did you think there should be consequences for both kids' behavior even though she did end up suffering a traumatic sexual assault?

How did you think Stone did at his first real trial?

Weigh in below, and don't forget if you missed anything you can always watch Law & Order: SVU online.