Skip to Content

The Myth of Universal Appeal: Is TV as Inclusive as It Thinks It Is?

In today’s age of endless content, streaming services, and supposedly “inclusive” storytelling, you’d think TV has something for everyone.

With diverse casts, cultural representation, and bold new narratives, it sure seems that way — at least on paper.

But if you’re part of the crowd that finds yourself rewatching Friends for the gazillionth time instead of diving into the latest TikTok-influenced teen drama, you’re not alone.

Haley's Birthday - Modern Family
(ABC)

Yeah, I know what you’re thinking: “Is she gonna whine?”

Well, isn’t that the trend these days? 😉

The truth is, despite having 500 channels and thousands of series to choose from, it feels like there’s less worth watching.

The endless choice paradoxically leaves us longing for the kind of shows that drew in everyone, from Gen Z to Boomers, with shared laughs and common ground.

The Cast of Friends 1999-2000 Season
((Photo by Warner Bros. Television))

The “Nostalgia Rewind”

When you have to go back to shows from 20 or 30 years ago just to feel entertained, you start to realize that despite all the progress, modern TV might not be as inclusive as it thinks.

Sure, there are diverse faces on screen and socially conscious conversations in the dialogue, but that doesn’t necessarily translate to inclusive storytelling.

In trying so hard to keep up with trends, shows often cater to niche audiences at the expense of universal appeal.

The result? Older viewers and those outside the social media generation often feel like they’re on the outside looking in.

(Freeform)

Classic shows like Cheers, The Golden Girls, and The Wonder Years managed to draw in viewers of all ages by blending humor with human experiences.

These series weren’t built around social media slang or trendy dialogue, but they tapped into universal themes that made everyone feel included.

They didn’t have to push boundaries just for shock value because they offered stories that felt authentic.

Today, shows like Abbott Elementary still achieve this to some extent, mixing comedy with relatable experiences.

However, for every Abbott Elementary, there are countless other series hyper-focused on narrow cultural moments that alienate anyone not in the know.

(ABC/Screenshot)

Streaming’s Splintering Effect

The streaming era has brought a golden age of choice, but with that comes a sense of isolation.

The sheer volume of content has fragmented viewership, making it hard to find shows that unite people like Friends or The Office once did.

Even long-running dramas like Blue Bloods have found a way to resonate across generations by focusing on big themes like family and justice.

The Family Tradition Continues - Blue Bloods Season 13 Episode 18
(CBS/HIGHEST QUALITY SCREENGRAB AVAILABLE)

But shows like that are becoming extinct these days.

And with Blue Bloods having been recently axed, you might want to savor the last few episodes — because who needs a classic nuclear family drama in a world that’s so over it, right?

It’s funny, isn’t it? We’re told TV has “never been better,” yet we often search for comfort in old favorites.

And with many of those shows available on streaming platforms, the new generation is actually watching and enjoying them. Hmm. Interesting.

Maybe that says more about today’s television than anything else.

It’s not that modern shows shouldn’t address current issues or target niche markets, but they can do so while still capturing universal themes.

(Disney/Patrick Harbron)

The best TV doesn’t just reflect a moment; it reflects something timeless.

There’s a reason people keep revisiting older shows — it’s not just about nostalgia; it’s about the shared experiences that transcend age, culture, and background.

And let’s be real, don’t a lot of these so-called “modern” shows try to bring back that old-school vibe?

If everything was supposedly so terrible back then, why bother recreating it? Because, let me tell you, you’re missing the mark.

(Vivian Zink/NBC)

The Real Challenge for Modern TV

The real challenge for TV isn’t just to be “inclusive” or “relevant” but to find a balance that connects different generations.

Instead of alienating viewers with hyper-focused content, why not weave today’s realities into stories that resonate with everyone?

After all, isn’t that the point of good storytelling — giving every viewer something to relate to, regardless of their age or social media savvy?

A Campfire Bachelor Party - This Is Us Season 5 Episode 15
(Ron Batzdorff/NBC)

So, while today’s landscape offers more content than ever, it’s worth asking: Are we truly moving forward, or are we just replacing one type of exclusivity with another?

Inclusivity should mean making room for stories that everyone can enjoy, not just those who speak the language of the latest trend.

What about you?

Do you find yourself reaching further back into TV history, or do you get pleasure from more current programming? We’d love to hear from you!

Logan Devendeer

Thursday 31st of October 2024

The creation of plenty of options certainly harmed most shows, as it made even harder to distinguish one show from the many others that have the same theme. And we are definitely picky with what we watch because the bar has been raised quite highly too... there are very few original ideas, so they need to improve on what has already been done, and some are simply overdone by now.

But I think the biggest issue is that so many shows feel as if they were essentially done by a commitee crunching numbers of what they feel is going to reach the biggest audience - and failing badly at that. They -need- (in their opinion) to have a character representing this group, the other group, the villain has to be of a certain race and sex, all due to their impression of what the most vocal sides of the internet is. Added to it is that the characters then are not "real" people, but props in a message the writers or the bosses want to pass to the audience instead of people going through a story - instead of a show, we are watching activism disguised as something allegedly interesting. And then the writers also cannot do certain things (women related to the hero cannot be killed because it is 'fridging', any issue that a lgbt couple faces is a trope that cannot be done, and plenty of other examples) which kills any inovation.

Is it a new thing? Certainly not. In a way, most shows before also had this issue. But I feel they did it better before... Boston Legal was as liberal as it could be, many times throwing its message on people's faces without any subtely, but still managed to entertain with good stories. Now the message, the preaching, seems to take precedence instead of entertainment, and whether it is the case or not, that is the impression I have of many shows, and sometimes the impression is all it takes. Especially when many people just want to forget about their reality, having it thrown back in their faces every time just pushes them away.

And we have a lot more knowledge about how things work behind the scenes too. I feel like, before, a lot of people might complain that the actress playing Yennefer in the Witcher is not as beautiful as the character is supposed to be (just like people complained about Jamie Dornan not being hot enough to portray Christian Grey) but it would be easily pushed aside, or simply something ignored by most. But then there is the story that circulated a while ago (granted, I haven't checked if it was true, but for the sake of the argument) that the showrunner picked that actress to 'challenge beauty stereotypes', which is also ironic because I still feel she is beautiful, and now her actual talent in the role won't matter, she'll be known to many as just another prop or lesson thrown in our face instead. Plus, of course, the news about how the writers despised the original material... It was easier to like something when you don't know all the reasons why things happen.

Last, to me, is the cost. Everything now is way too expensive and what you get in return is never enough. Don't get me wrong, they should earn everything they invested and a lot more, but instead of keeping projects with realistic expectations, everything has to be the new Lost or GoT, so you get back to the first point... having to reach the widest possible audience instead of telling a story that might earn a lot less but still be profitable and worthy doing money-wise. It kills new ideas easily and ends up giving us only what is safe - and even then most still fail to perform.

Carissa Pavlica

Thursday 31st of October 2024

Fantastic argument! I rewatched Boston Legal a couple of years ago, and it puts most storytelling to shame now. Well, it did then, too, but I get the impression writers now think they've evolved in some way because they don't insult people.

As you said, Boston Legal was a liberal premise. But by partnering Alan Shore and Denny Crane, they allowed for all kinds of disagreements that could thoughtfully unfold over the course of an hour or even a season of television. They weren't always right, and they said and did some nasty things, but they learned from them.

People on TV now seem to come into the program knowing everything, which staunches any evolution a character can have.

There is an argument over boyfriends on 9-1-1 now because one guy was a nasty piece of work when he was first introduced. He's not allowed to evolve. Apparently, evolution is forbidden in today's culture. So, what's the point of any of it?

TV should help us through the tough times with valuable lessons made by way of entertaining characters and debatable plots, but when everyone arrives at the table holier than thou, what do you get in return? Not much by way of evolution and certainly very little entertainment value. Shows today won't be remembered because the storytelling is ultimately empty. It's kind of a bummer.

Azarkhan

Wednesday 30th of October 2024

In the Orwellian world of the Left inclusion means exclusion, like the term ‘safe space’.

I don’t watch old tv shows unless it’s something relatively recent like “Continuum” or something I missed like “Orphan Black”. These days I’m mostly into Youtube for the podcasts, historical documentaries and especially the music although it’s been bothering me lately because I’ve gotten away from K-world and other shows I want to watch like “The Penguin”. Hopefully after Big Orange gets re-elected (keeping my Aryan fingers crossed!) I’ll get back to my old routine.

Ayra Starr – Rush https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=crtQSTYWtqE

Carissa Pavlica

Wednesday 30th of October 2024

I've been watching so much old TV! I'm watching Homicide: Life on the Street right now, and it's pretty good. Continuum is on my list to watch again. I'm watching a lot more old TV than I am new. Not sure if that's a personal problem or if it's a larger statement on TV. Maybe a combination of both.

Sharing is Caring

Help spread the word. You're awesome for doing it!