First...
This is not gothic AT ALL. But I get it,you guys tried to make a reference to Blair's quote.
But seriously,why people are still shocked about what Taylor is wearing (or not wearing)? This have been going on for a year now,or more...It's not even scandalous anymore,it's just silly,because clearly,it's just an act: teenage girl trying to be rebel wearing black clothes and heavy make up. How rebel is she,right?
Anyway...i'm just waiting for the day that she will walk on the red carpet with nothing more than bra and panties and everybody will freak out asking themselves where are her parents.
I don't see how people getting shocked by this can be considered narrow minded as some here are saying...
We shouldn't feel comfortable watching girls that young being sexualized,we shouldn't admire something like that. Taylor may be in this industry for 10,15 years already,and then,she thinks it's enough to make her a mature woman,well,it's not. It doesn't matter if people treat you like a grown up.
This is not a woman feeling comfortable with her sexuality to the point of showing a little more skin in covers of magazines,this is a teenange girl trying to shock the world by taking her clothes of,showing us how grown up and rebel she is,wich,in fact,only make her look more and more immature.
So why people should admire this kind of behaviour? I get it,I don't think people should go bashing on her,but if it's something that bothers you,people are allowed to say it,cause really,in our society this is getting common,but that doesn't mean that everybody should agree with this.
I,for one,could care less... Like I said,it something that have been done before so many times that doesn't shock me at all... Britney,Aguilera,many others already tried to left behind their little girls image this same way... And this made them being taken seriously? No,just make them look kinda pathetic,I might say. And that is what makes me a bit dissapointed with Taylor,cause that's what people will think of her,and she could be a little smarter,cause honestly,that just puts her and Miley in the same level. Sadly.
Oh,and btw,if she thinks she's a real rocker because she is wearing black lingerie,too much make up,a cross around her neck and a poise that says: "Fuck you all,bitches!",then she seriously have to learn what rock really is,cause now I don't see much difference between her and Rihanna.
That's really a funny thing...
You see,not a long time ago,Taylor said she wanted to be taken seriously,that she wasn't just like any teenanger,that her music is SRS and she's COMPLETELY different from the Disney-pop-princesses-turned-into-sluts crew.
And maybe she really is,because,even though Pretty Reckeless isn't THE BEST THING I've heard these past months,their music is ok,and Taylor has a nice voice,IMO. But everything about this picture screams: "desesperate for attention","one time a cute girl,now a trainwreck"... I'm not saying I agree with these judgements,but that's what this image says after all. When I look at it,I don't see Taylor Momsen,the Pretty Reckeless singer,showing she's more than Jenny Humphrey and how her music carrer is interesting...All I see is a girl trying to hard to show us how grown up she is,but she doesn't see how immature she looks like,all I see is someone trying too hard to shock us with the lack of clothing,but she doesn't realize that many others did exactly the same much earlier,so it's not shocking anymore,it's kind of stupid.
So if the reason of this is to be shocking,cause she's only 17,and everybody seem to go crazy about it,like they were her parents,then it's ridiculous...Girls with no clothes trying to hard to be bad asses? This is sooo not new,actually,it's kinda getting old,after hearing so much about how her music carrer is so important,I was expecting something more...creative? Come on girl,there are better ways to show us you're no longer a little girl anymore,let the sluttyness to Miley...
Oh,and one more thing... Juliet is so amazing! Why she has to leave??? It was about time we have some psycho bitch messing with everyone's lives,since Georgina is too busy with baby Milo...wich is super cute,btw.
I would like to be happy with the idea of Dair happening in this show,because,honestly,this couple has so much potential,if done properly...And that's the reason why I can't be 100% happy if Dair actually happens. The thing is: the writers ruin everything,and lately,things are only getting worse,and it seems to me,that they are so close minded that they don't even notice all the crap they are doing.
So if Dair end up being something more than partners in crime,they will turn this into another meaningless hook up -because we can never have enough of them,right??- just to add to their extense list of "OMFG moments"
or if they actually work to make Dan and Blair be a couple,in a certain moment of their relationship,the writers will turn Blair into this sad creature,that can only be happy with Chuck,no matter how hard she tries to be with other guys,it will always be Chuck...Because she can't be happy with a guy that likes her for what she is,or respects her or actually cares about her...No...
True love is all about your boyfriend pimping you to his psychotic uncle in exchange of a hotel,blaming you for this after,because: "Bitch,you went up there on your own!"...Then,having sex with half of manhantan,including his step-sister...But wait,he bought you a ring! a fucking RING! You MUST forgive him,it's real love.
I think that's what the writers must have in their minds.
If that is true,wich,I believe it's not...
Then,what immature cast,hun?
If Ed and Jessica broke up,it's their problem,no one should take sides.
But the whole article sounds so fake,I mean,Jessica is friends with everyone in the cast.
I can despise Vanessa,but Jessica is a different person,and even though I want her out of the show,she doesn't deserve all the hate she gets. Vanessa does.
Anyway,the good part about this break up? Jessica will finally stop talking about Ed constantly on interviews,and possibly make a career on her own,instead of be somebody's girlfriend.
Such a Blake outfit. ;)
I'm so used to see so much of Blake's cleavage and/or legs,that if one day she shows up all covered up,I'll be seriously worried.
I really like this song,and Taylor is an amazing singer! And she looks stunning here!
But the video? Just like "Make me wanna die",nothing really happens. It's just Taylor and her band. They are there,with no expression,while Taylor rolls everywhere. There's nothing wrong about it,but I was expecting something more...creative? funny? or even shocking? IDK,just because she wears a tight dress doesn't make this video shocking or polemic...if that's what she wanted with it.
I'm impressed about the repercussions of it,seriously. Just because she is wearing a tight dress,everybody is making such a big deal of it? It's her style,she dress herself like that all the time,I thought people would be used to it by now. The video is just kind of boring,it's not shocking. And I'm kinda disapointed,cause this could be something more than just her rolling over a table,the song could be better used.
I think they are their best when they use less make up.
and IMO,all of these girls are gorgeous,to be honest,GG has one of the best-looking cast ever.
But I don't get it why some people here keep saying that Leighton is average... Just because she doesn't have blue eyes or blonde hair?
Sorry,for me,an averege girl is one that doesn't stand out,and I have met plenty of blonde,blue eyes girls that didn't have a beauty that standed out. Leighton,on the other hand,may be a brunette with brown eyes and pale skin,but she certainly is gorgeous and have a unique beauty. I'm not one of the crazy Leighton fans that can't face the fact that not everyone will love her or worship her,just like I'm not one of these crazy people that just because they hate Vanessa,the must hate Jessica and say she's ugly. She's not,she may not be your favorite,but she isn't ugly. All I'm trying to say is that,is not the colour of the hair or the eyes,or the skin tone,that define a girl beauty,of course these things matter,but the most important is how everything is put together,and how the girl work it. I think it's time to people stop thinking that blonde hair and/or blue eyes is what make a girl gorgeous.
If they wanted to choose a guest-star instead of a regular,they could easily pick Michelle instead. I mean,every time I hear Georgina is around,I get excited just to see her,and she succeeded to steal the scene every time.
Hilary Duff,scene stealer? This is a joke right? OH right,I kinda get it. I mean,her SL was been Dan's girlfriend and Vanessa's best friend,and since Dan became totally boring when he was with her,and since even a Disney star can top Jessica acting skills,and guess she stole the scene?
Seriously,the big scene stealer is Ian Somerhalder,and in GG,Leighton is the biggest scene stealer,even when the writing for Blair sucks,she still manage to make me love her.
More hated than Vanessa? That's impossible. Just because Eva may be in the way of a Chair reunion or whatever,doesn't mean she's a hypocrate bitch like Vanessa. And Clemence is so lovely,and such a good actress.
I really don't give a damn about Vanessa's character,and I'm pretty sure I'm not the only one that don't wanna know where she comes from either.
Seriously,2 episodes would be more than enough for her.
But now that the shit is done,at least let the girl get together with Rufus already.
"she's out of control yet she always stands on her soapbox judging everyone else ugh".
Couldn't agree more meester411!
Serena cheated with almost everyone in this show: Nate,Gabriel,Tripp,who was married,btw....and still she thinks she has all the right to tell Rufus to stay away from her mother?
I couldn't more happy that Vanessa is out of the picture,I would rather if it was permanent,but give me 10 episodes without her and I will be happy. But she's leaving "to accept a very fancy, far away job with CNN"? What's her most notable job? Filming Dan eating a cereal? How unrealistic is that? First Serena is a PR and now Vanessa will work on CNN...Oh Gossip Girl,I know this is not real life,but that's too much.
Seriously,Taylor was never involved with drugs or any sort of scandal,she's only bashed because they way she dresses,and honestly,I really like her style,and the girl can sing!People just wanna a reason to bash the others.
How cute is the Nate and Jenny video?
Oh please writers,make Nenny happen!
Dan already is with Vanessa,so we already have a boring couple on the show,there's no need for Serenate ;)
Comments by Charlotte Waldorf
Gothic Barbie Surfaces at MTV Europe Music Awards
This is not gothic AT ALL. But I get it,you guys tried to make a reference to Blair's quote.
But seriously,why people are still shocked about what Taylor is wearing (or not wearing)? This have been going on for a year now,or more...It's not even scandalous anymore,it's just silly,because clearly,it's just an act: teenage girl trying to be rebel wearing black clothes and heavy make up. How rebel is she,right?
Anyway...i'm just waiting for the day that she will walk on the red carpet with nothing more than bra and panties and everybody will freak out asking themselves where are her parents.
Taylor Momsen Covers Revolver
We shouldn't feel comfortable watching girls that young being sexualized,we shouldn't admire something like that. Taylor may be in this industry for 10,15 years already,and then,she thinks it's enough to make her a mature woman,well,it's not. It doesn't matter if people treat you like a grown up.
This is not a woman feeling comfortable with her sexuality to the point of showing a little more skin in covers of magazines,this is a teenange girl trying to shock the world by taking her clothes of,showing us how grown up and rebel she is,wich,in fact,only make her look more and more immature.
So why people should admire this kind of behaviour? I get it,I don't think people should go bashing on her,but if it's something that bothers you,people are allowed to say it,cause really,in our society this is getting common,but that doesn't mean that everybody should agree with this.
I,for one,could care less... Like I said,it something that have been done before so many times that doesn't shock me at all... Britney,Aguilera,many others already tried to left behind their little girls image this same way... And this made them being taken seriously? No,just make them look kinda pathetic,I might say. And that is what makes me a bit dissapointed with Taylor,cause that's what people will think of her,and she could be a little smarter,cause honestly,that just puts her and Miley in the same level. Sadly.
Oh,and btw,if she thinks she's a real rocker because she is wearing black lingerie,too much make up,a cross around her neck and a poise that says: "Fuck you all,bitches!",then she seriously have to learn what rock really is,cause now I don't see much difference between her and Rihanna.
Taylor Momsen Covers Revolver
You see,not a long time ago,Taylor said she wanted to be taken seriously,that she wasn't just like any teenanger,that her music is SRS and she's COMPLETELY different from the Disney-pop-princesses-turned-into-sluts crew.
And maybe she really is,because,even though Pretty Reckeless isn't THE BEST THING I've heard these past months,their music is ok,and Taylor has a nice voice,IMO. But everything about this picture screams: "desesperate for attention","one time a cute girl,now a trainwreck"... I'm not saying I agree with these judgements,but that's what this image says after all. When I look at it,I don't see Taylor Momsen,the Pretty Reckeless singer,showing she's more than Jenny Humphrey and how her music carrer is interesting...All I see is a girl trying to hard to show us how grown up she is,but she doesn't see how immature she looks like,all I see is someone trying too hard to shock us with the lack of clothing,but she doesn't realize that many others did exactly the same much earlier,so it's not shocking anymore,it's kind of stupid.
So if the reason of this is to be shocking,cause she's only 17,and everybody seem to go crazy about it,like they were her parents,then it's ridiculous...Girls with no clothes trying to hard to be bad asses? This is sooo not new,actually,it's kinda getting old,after hearing so much about how her music carrer is so important,I was expecting something more...creative? Come on girl,there are better ways to show us you're no longer a little girl anymore,let the sluttyness to Miley...
Gossip Girl Spoilers: Dair vs. Juliet!
Gossip Girl Spoilers: Dair vs. Juliet!
So if Dair end up being something more than partners in crime,they will turn this into another meaningless hook up -because we can never have enough of them,right??- just to add to their extense list of "OMFG moments"
or if they actually work to make Dan and Blair be a couple,in a certain moment of their relationship,the writers will turn Blair into this sad creature,that can only be happy with Chuck,no matter how hard she tries to be with other guys,it will always be Chuck...Because she can't be happy with a guy that likes her for what she is,or respects her or actually cares about her...No...
True love is all about your boyfriend pimping you to his psychotic uncle in exchange of a hotel,blaming you for this after,because: "Bitch,you went up there on your own!"...Then,having sex with half of manhantan,including his step-sister...But wait,he bought you a ring! a fucking RING! You MUST forgive him,it's real love.
I think that's what the writers must have in their minds.
Blake Lively Featured in Marie Claire UK
Awful Gossip Girl Rumor Debunked
Ed Westwick: Turning Gossip Girl Cast Against Jessica Szohr!
Then,what immature cast,hun?
If Ed and Jessica broke up,it's their problem,no one should take sides.
But the whole article sounds so fake,I mean,Jessica is friends with everyone in the cast.
I can despise Vanessa,but Jessica is a different person,and even though I want her out of the show,she doesn't deserve all the hate she gets. Vanessa does.
Anyway,the good part about this break up? Jessica will finally stop talking about Ed constantly on interviews,and possibly make a career on her own,instead of be somebody's girlfriend.
Blake Lively Makes Guys' Year at Comic-Con
I'm so used to see so much of Blake's cleavage and/or legs,that if one day she shows up all covered up,I'll be seriously worried.
Taylor Momsen in New Pretty Reckless Video: Too Racy?
But the video? Just like "Make me wanna die",nothing really happens. It's just Taylor and her band. They are there,with no expression,while Taylor rolls everywhere. There's nothing wrong about it,but I was expecting something more...creative? funny? or even shocking? IDK,just because she wears a tight dress doesn't make this video shocking or polemic...if that's what she wanted with it.
I'm impressed about the repercussions of it,seriously. Just because she is wearing a tight dress,everybody is making such a big deal of it? It's her style,she dress herself like that all the time,I thought people would be used to it by now. The video is just kind of boring,it's not shocking. And I'm kinda disapointed,cause this could be something more than just her rolling over a table,the song could be better used.
The Many Faces of Gossip Girl Style
and IMO,all of these girls are gorgeous,to be honest,GG has one of the best-looking cast ever.
But I don't get it why some people here keep saying that Leighton is average... Just because she doesn't have blue eyes or blonde hair?
Sorry,for me,an averege girl is one that doesn't stand out,and I have met plenty of blonde,blue eyes girls that didn't have a beauty that standed out. Leighton,on the other hand,may be a brunette with brown eyes and pale skin,but she certainly is gorgeous and have a unique beauty. I'm not one of the crazy Leighton fans that can't face the fact that not everyone will love her or worship her,just like I'm not one of these crazy people that just because they hate Vanessa,the must hate Jessica and say she's ugly. She's not,she may not be your favorite,but she isn't ugly. All I'm trying to say is that,is not the colour of the hair or the eyes,or the skin tone,that define a girl beauty,of course these things matter,but the most important is how everything is put together,and how the girl work it. I think it's time to people stop thinking that blonde hair and/or blue eyes is what make a girl gorgeous.
CW Shows, Stars Lead Second Wave of Teen Choice Award Nominations
CW Shows, Stars Lead Second Wave of Teen Choice Award Nominations
Seriously,the big scene stealer is Ian Somerhalder,and in GG,Leighton is the biggest scene stealer,even when the writing for Blair sucks,she still manage to make me love her.
Katie Cassidy Cast as Nate's Love Interest on Gossip Girl
Make it happen GG!
Clemence Poesy Cast as Eva on Gossip Girl
Jessica Szohr Hoping For Danessa Reconciliation, Relationship
Seriously,2 episodes would be more than enough for her.
But now that the shit is done,at least let the girl get together with Rufus already.
Three More Gossip Girl Clips: "Ex-Husbands and Wives"
Couldn't agree more meester411!
Serena cheated with almost everyone in this show: Nate,Gabriel,Tripp,who was married,btw....and still she thinks she has all the right to tell Rufus to stay away from her mother?
Pure comedy.
Gossip Girl Spoilers: Vanessa Leaving Town?!
Gossip Girl Poster Proclaims: The Bitch is Back!
Taylor Momsen Rocks Out ... Hard Core
More Gossip Girl Sneak Previews: "The Unblairable Lightness of Being"
Who cares about Chair?
These three in a episode is enough to make me happy
Cyrus and Eleanor Picture
My life is complete!
How lovely is the fact that he is shorter than Eleanor?
Got love Cyrus!I will never have enough of him
More Gossip Girl Sneak Previews: "Inglorious Bassterds"
Oh please writers,make Nenny happen!
Dan already is with Vanessa,so we already have a boring couple on the show,there's no need for Serenate ;)
Eleanor is Back
Ok,all I need is Cyrus now *-*
Viva V
Good to know,I have to remeber to fast forward this scene
I don't wanna throw up on my tv