Kristin talks with JS and SS about FINALE (Spoilers)
We're still not really sure what to say about last night's jaw-dropping Gossip Girl finale, so we went straight to show runners Josh Schwartz and Stephanie Savage for a little clarification. You fans have been asking all day, is ***** a goner?! Is ******** really preggers?! When will ***** and ******** be back on the show?! Spoiler Alert! Do not read on if you haven't watched the episode, 'cause the silly asterisks end right here!
Here's what Josh and Stephanie had to say:
First, the money quote from Josh Schwartz: "Tell all the Gossip Girl fans out there we're just getting warmed up. We want to drive them into an even greater frenzy."
Could that even be possible? Check out Twitter for Gossip Girl reactions from the past 24 hours and you'll know it is so far the most talked about season finale so far this month by far.
Talk about OMFG! What kind of response have you received after last night's finale?Josh Schwartz: Certainly the Twitter account is blowing up. But the cool thing is that people are really reacting, which is great. Obviously, some people are terrified that Chuck Bass is dead. Some people are furious about what happened with Chuck and Jenny.Stephanie Savage: They're furious for different reasons. Some people are mad at Jenny; some people are mad at Chuck.J.S.: Which is great. If you put a finale on, you want it to be the kind that people talk about for the summer.
Why choose to go in such a drastic direction with the finale?S.S.: We designed the finale to allow people's perceptions to shift. People who had been pretty comfortable all year thinking that Jenny Humphrey was a villain might find some sympathy for her in this episode. And people who have been comfortable thinking that Chuck was a lovable bastard may feel he crossed the line in this episode. We wanted to blur the edges.J.S.: That's the show. We were launched on the "OMFG" ad campaign; we gotta live up to that.S.S.: We wanted to do a finale that would drive us right into next season. Sometimes it takes us a little while to get our momentum up, and we wanted to do something heart-charging this year.
Talk about the Chuck-Jenny hookup. Some fans are struggling with it.J.S.: It's a move that's been in the DNA of the show since the first episode. That relationship is something that was in the pilot—it was Chuck being a predator. And here they meet in a place where they are almost equals, in terms of where they are emotionally. It was a way to track the evolution of the characters over three seasons.S.S.: They're two characters who are really at their lowest point. And Jenny at her lowest is choosing to do the thing that she so resisted doing in the pilot, and Chuck at his lowest does the act that he's been so remorseful for since the pilot.Giovanni Rufino / The CW
Now that Chuck and Jenny have this out of their respective systems, you think they're both redeemable?J.S.: Everybody is offered a second chance in life. If Chuck weren't to survive what happened in the finale, at least he went out in an act of nobility. Jenny's looking to get a second chance and to leave the city behind and start over. Hopefully both characters were offered an opportunity for redemption by the end of the episode.S.S.: Redemption is a huge theme on the show, from the pilot. Is it possible for a person to change? What can be forgiven? Who can be redeemed? That's the thematic material of the show.
Can Blair forgive Chuck after this misstep?J.S.: First, there's the question of what happened to Chuck at the end of this episode.S.S.: Let's see if Chuck can recover from his bullet wound first.J.S.: Blair can forgive Chuck in her heart—if he's no longer with us.
And is Chuck no longer with us?J.S.: I'm just saying that would be a way to forgive Chuck, if he lost his life trying to protect the engagement ring he was going to offer to Blair. That's a pretty noble gesture that can erase a lot of wrongs.
Don't forget, you recently promised us that Chuck and Blair are always at the forefront of your storytelling.J.S.: That's not a lie.S.S.: That's totally true.Humberto Carreno/startraksphoto.com
Now that Mercy has been cancelled, will we see more Michelle Trachtenberg—and is Georgina really preggers?J.S.: Oh, she's pregnant. We love Michelle, and we're always looking for ways to bring her into the show each season.
Vanessa was MIA in the finale. Will Jessica Szhor be back next season?S.S.: She will be back at some point.
What about Taylor Momsen? When is her leave of absence up?S.S.: We have a plan, but we want to save it as a surprise.
Will Blair make good on her promise to destroy Little J if she comes back to the city?J.S.: Blair doesn't make promises [she can't keep].S.S.: We will do whatever will create maximum drama.
Ain't that the truth!Read more: http://ca.eonline.com/uberblog/watch_with_kristin/b181642_really_dead_gossip_girl_bosses_tell_all.html?cmpid=rss-000000-twitterfeed-365-kristin&utm_source=eonline&utm_medium=twitterfeed&utm_campaign=twitterfeed_kristin#ixzz0oKj4Tk2n
Why aren't we getting any straight answers as to if it's Dan's baby or not?
and they are making it sound like Chuck actually dies... lol.
Chuck weren't to survive what happened in the finale, at least he went out in an act of nobility.
So he's really a goner, eh?
yeah they really made it seem like chuck dies, maybe blair might imagine how her life would be if he died in a sort of dream thing? idk just a thought. and im sure the georgina thing will shock us with whatever answer it is, and im glad that little j will be back to stir up drama, and blair never fails to keep a promise!
also, epic win how they arent planing having vanessa coming back anytime soon!
Chuckles better not die. I would be heartbroken.
I really don't belive Chuck dies. They're just trying to be misterious. What's the funny if they told us 'Relax, Chuck is alive and Blair will take care of him! Plus G's baby is not Dan's. Don't worry'. They NEED to make drama for we think about it in the summer. I'm not worried at ALL. Chuck's alive, for sure.
I think they just aren't saying whether or not Chuck died b/c of the reaction on Twitter. They want people to keep talking about it, freak out and tune in when September comes to find out what happened.
We will do whatever will create maximum drama.
I'm growing scared of the world "drama".
Everybody loved season 1, and if we think about it, it was probably the season with the least amount of "drama". The SLs were simple and treated real/believabe problems (for the most part): UES vs Brooklyn, friend that sleeps with her best friend's boyfriend, the best friend that comes between a couple, cheating, people trying to change, father who's a criminal, etc. If you compare that to S3: cancer victim not talking to her husband, long cons with Poppy and Gabriel, the weird Tripp and Carter SLs and Chuck's mother, who everyone thought was dead for 20 years coming back to help her lover, who by the way is the brother of the father of her child, to destroy her son's life, plus DNA tests and bribes. Completely out of control.
It's not that hard to keep a show interesting with simple problems, proof: they did it once before.
My problem is not that they want to do OMG moments. My problem is that they're more like WTF moments b/c they're not character driven.
Chuck dying.. that really is laughable.
Savage...give it up.
See ya GG if you kill off Chuck Bass..what are you going to do..bring him as a ghost that haunts Blair's world? then admit Blair to the psych ward ?
HAhahaha.. Chuck bass is not dead. Chuck and Blair keep this where it is. Without the drama of C/B..Gossip Girl would not be running.