Castle Review: Wild Nights Result in Death Comments (Page 3)
38 Comments
MissMontyH
January 22nd, 2013 7:02 AM
The only issue I have with this episode (and others) is that there's a clear pattern that's being established: the murderer is the guy/girl who appears at the beginning of the episode, only to reappear at the very end with a fresh new mobile which had nothing to do with the last 30 minutes.
I'm not familiar with how things work, but since Beckett knew Espo was going on a date with the bodyguard and was okay with it, it didn't really shock me. She had been cleared, and even though we know that each suspect has to come back at least once to the precinct, the characters don't.
As for Alexis's vlog, I'm with you guys. Plus, I didn't see Alexis as the kind of girl to have a Vlog and share things like that online.
Sue Ann Rank: Recurring Character
January 22nd, 2013 1:02 AM
I did not watch this closely; I always re-watch later in the week at a more convenient time. But I noticed both of joyeful's points 2 and 3 as I watched, and I totally agree with both of them. The wealth and celebrity of her father should make Alexis much more careful about her behavior. She is putting herself at risk. There are monsters out there, and sickos. Just watch the news any night of the week.
I did notice the absence of Gates, and I basked in it.
And Ryan looked HOT in that suit! He is a gorgeous guy ...
joyeful Rank: Regular Character
January 21st, 2013 11:28 PM
(sigh) I'm sorry Castle - but I really didn't like this episode - AT ALL.
1. One line drove me crazy:
Castle: I have two words for you - "Vito Corleone"
Beckett: Technically those are names, not words.
I almost died. ARE YOU KIDDING ME? How did that line make it past editing? Who wrote that?!? And more importantly, where's the Richard Castle we used to know - the famous author/grammar snob - to tell Kate that names are proper nouns and are actually words? Gah.
2. Alexis having a vlog is a bad idea - not just because the internet can be a bad place with creepy people, but because her father is a famous & RICH man that nefarious people would probably love to target for a ransom. How did that not factor into the argument?
3. Why wouldn't Espo have waited for the case to close before asking the chick out? I mean, there hasn't been a single case where someone hasn't had to be questioned twice.
Sorry, as much as I love Castle, I thought this episode was sloppy.
Castle: You guys get this a lot? Agent J…Agent K?
January 22nd, 2013 7:02 AM
The only issue I have with this episode (and others) is that there's a clear pattern that's being established: the murderer is the guy/girl who appears at the beginning of the episode, only to reappear at the very end with a fresh new mobile which had nothing to do with the last 30 minutes.
I'm not familiar with how things work, but since Beckett knew Espo was going on a date with the bodyguard and was okay with it, it didn't really shock me. She had been cleared, and even though we know that each suspect has to come back at least once to the precinct, the characters don't.
As for Alexis's vlog, I'm with you guys. Plus, I didn't see Alexis as the kind of girl to have a Vlog and share things like that online.
Rank: Recurring Character
January 22nd, 2013 1:02 AM
I did not watch this closely; I always re-watch later in the week at a more convenient time. But I noticed both of joyeful's points 2 and 3 as I watched, and I totally agree with both of them. The wealth and celebrity of her father should make Alexis much more careful about her behavior. She is putting herself at risk. There are monsters out there, and sickos. Just watch the news any night of the week.
I did notice the absence of Gates, and I basked in it.
And Ryan looked HOT in that suit! He is a gorgeous guy ...
Rank: Regular Character
January 21st, 2013 11:28 PM
(sigh) I'm sorry Castle - but I really didn't like this episode - AT ALL.
1. One line drove me crazy:
Castle: I have two words for you - "Vito Corleone"
Beckett: Technically those are names, not words.
I almost died. ARE YOU KIDDING ME? How did that line make it past editing? Who wrote that?!? And more importantly, where's the Richard Castle we used to know - the famous author/grammar snob - to tell Kate that names are proper nouns and are actually words? Gah.
2. Alexis having a vlog is a bad idea - not just because the internet can be a bad place with creepy people, but because her father is a famous & RICH man that nefarious people would probably love to target for a ransom. How did that not factor into the argument?
3. Why wouldn't Espo have waited for the case to close before asking the chick out? I mean, there hasn't been a single case where someone hasn't had to be questioned twice.
Sorry, as much as I love Castle, I thought this episode was sloppy.