I can see why they wouldn't try and duplicate the Charlie character but the new character has no crisp delivery like the Harper character. I think they miscast Kutcher. He doesn't seem to be suited to the fast paced repartee that made the show a sucess. I watched 2 1/2 episodes before I just went to the science channel. I think Harper went about things all wrong and was a jerk but he did fill that spot well. I agree that the existing cast could have likely carried the shown. They just work great together. I wish them well but I don't see it lasting the way it is. Adjustments need to be made.
philipnixon
October 6th, 2011 5:29 PM
kutcher is the biggest fucktard in hollywood dumb can act total asehole looser only reason hes famous is hes banging that cougar debbie moore a fucking tool and a half stewie
mom
October 5th, 2011 4:09 PM
The Nielsen ratings cannot meter how many people actually liked or dislike a show. They can only determine how many television sets are tuned-in to any channel at any given time. That’s why I love these review forums for the real feedback.
The movie industry plays the same game by giving us box office results to promote their films. The worse movie made today makes more money than the best movie made 25 years ago simply because of movie prices and not how good the movie really was.
Rock
October 5th, 2011 3:48 PM
Men "was" my all time favorite show.Now it is not.The main ingredient (Charlie)made the show funny.It is not what it was.It sucks.You need CHARLIE BACK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Charlie's angel
October 4th, 2011 9:47 AM
Look we all know why the ratings are high and it is not because of Walden schmuck. Stop trying to make us believe the show's good because ratings are high or should I say, hyped.
robert
October 3rd, 2011 9:48 PM
great supporting cast with NOTHING to support. Totally sucks.
Aislavida Rank: New User
October 3rd, 2011 4:32 AM
@ Scott, there is a simple trick => if you don't like it, stop watching it
Scott Bannigan
October 2nd, 2011 1:42 AM
Watching a test pattern for 30 minutes would more entertaining. What a fiasco this show has become.
Walden: Hey, what are you doing..? Alan: Just going down memory lane. This is a photo book Lyndsey gave me, oh look, here we are at the Santa Monica pier, "O...
October 12th, 2011 3:32 PM
Charlie has moved on to greener pastures. Too bad for us. I think he was tired of it anyway. WE LOVE YOU CHARLIE!
October 12th, 2011 8:32 AM
Bring in Hugh Grant please.
October 11th, 2011 4:26 PM
The ratings of first two shows were big because it has an appeal of a train wreck - just can't look away from this disaster...
Rank: New User
October 7th, 2011 9:22 PM
I can see why they wouldn't try and duplicate the Charlie character but the new character has no crisp delivery like the Harper character. I think they miscast Kutcher. He doesn't seem to be suited to the fast paced repartee that made the show a sucess. I watched 2 1/2 episodes before I just went to the science channel. I think Harper went about things all wrong and was a jerk but he did fill that spot well. I agree that the existing cast could have likely carried the shown. They just work great together. I wish them well but I don't see it lasting the way it is. Adjustments need to be made.
October 6th, 2011 5:29 PM
kutcher is the biggest fucktard in hollywood dumb can act total asehole looser only reason hes famous is hes banging that cougar debbie moore a fucking tool and a half stewie
October 5th, 2011 4:09 PM
The Nielsen ratings cannot meter how many people actually liked or dislike a show. They can only determine how many television sets are tuned-in to any channel at any given time. That’s why I love these review forums for the real feedback.
The movie industry plays the same game by giving us box office results to promote their films. The worse movie made today makes more money than the best movie made 25 years ago simply because of movie prices and not how good the movie really was.
October 5th, 2011 3:48 PM
Men "was" my all time favorite show.Now it is not.The main ingredient (Charlie)made the show funny.It is not what it was.It sucks.You need CHARLIE BACK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
October 4th, 2011 9:47 AM
Look we all know why the ratings are high and it is not because of Walden schmuck. Stop trying to make us believe the show's good because ratings are high or should I say, hyped.
October 3rd, 2011 9:48 PM
great supporting cast with NOTHING to support. Totally sucks.
Rank: New User
October 3rd, 2011 4:32 AM
@ Scott, there is a simple trick => if you don't like it, stop watching it
October 2nd, 2011 1:42 AM
Watching a test pattern for 30 minutes would more entertaining. What a fiasco this show has become.