Skip to Content

No Amount of Suits Cameos Will Help Suits LA — Here’s Why

Whether you were an OG Suits fan who tuned into the series during its entire run on USA Network or you caught up with the series via Netflix bingeing, we’ve all come to appreciate what this series has to offer.

The fashion, snappy dialogue and delivery, semi-glum setting, lovable jerk characters, and constant wheeling and dealing were genuinely fun to watch.

Harvey Specter? One of the all-time great characters played with expert precision by Gabriel Macht.

(Nicole Weingart/NBC)

Louis Litt? He has one of the most intriguing trajectories of a character onscreen, and Rick Hoffman is the greatest at bringing this man to life.

The series showed all the haters that Meghan Markle held her own playing the fierce Rachel Zane before she was the Duchess of Sussex.

Jessica Pearson is still the GOAT; we’re not taking any arguments on this. Donna is so great that you merely have to utter her name, and people get it. She’s Donna, end of story.

The series played fast and loose with the law, had dialogue that easily should’ve been obnoxious but somehow wasn’t, and uttered, “goddamn” so much you’d be comatose if you drank a dirty martini for each occasion.

(Shane Mahood/USA Network)

But Suits combined so many things we love about television, making the medium work and register with audiences.

It was edgy enough to attract a broad audience, had procedural elements that worked, was light enough to play at the Blue Sky Drama genre, had characters you wanted to be friends with, and had enough episodes to carry a season.

It’s no wonder the Suits Renaissance took off the second it hit Netflix and introduced this series to a whole new audience.

Unsurprisingly, the network wanted to capitalize on this success. But as usual, they never really know what viewers want; they think they do.

Worse yet, they think if they present us with something in a certain way, they can convince us that it’s what we’ve wanted the whole time, and we’ll subscribe to it.

Naturally, coming off the renewed success of Suits, a spinoff was on the horizon.

Stephen Amell on Suits LA.
(David Astorga/NBC)

But some of us were wary of that announcement from the start. For starters, it feels absurd to call something a spinoff all these years later when there’s no connective tissue between the original and said “spinoff.”

Suits LA is like if fanfiction came to life comprised of a slew of original characters and only hints at the legacy ones that people are most familiar with and love.

What’s become evident with Suits LA is that it’s essentially connected to Suits in name only. It’s a standard approach to a legal procedural with the attachment of IP in a blatant effort to cash in on that success.

Suits LA feels like it attempted to do a Matlock switcheroo that CBS managed to pull off.

Remember how we thought Matlock would be another (Gender-bent) reboot of a classic series? And then, by the end of Matlock Season 1 Episode 1, they blew our minds when it was evident that they had zero intention of rehashing that series but instead created its own.

Bryan Greenberg and Lex Scott Davis on Suits LA.
(David Astorga/NBC)

Suits LA isn’t like Matlock, though. It’s more like CBS’ Watson. And we have our own thoughts about how that freshman series fails to grip viewers because of its genre confusion.

At this point, Suits LA’s biggest error is desperately attempting to tie this “reboot” to the original, like fitting a square peg into a round hole.

No, it wasn’t strong enough to stand on its own in the first place because legal procedurals are a dime a dozen, and without the Suits moniker attached to it, the series doesn’t have a hook.

But at this point, what likely was the most significant factor in greenlighting this series has backfired drastically.

The only thing anchoring Suits LA to Suits has done thus far is weigh this new series down.

Stephen Amell and Josh McDermitt on Suits LA Season 1 Episode 1.
(David Astorga/NBC)

It’s crumbling under expectations, and it’ll never be able to live up to it, as, at best, it comes across like a CW version of a series we used to love.

In an effort to recapture some of the magic of the original, Suits LA actually fails to cultivate or create any of its own. It has no identity, and audiences are sharp enough to pick out posers.

The series’ setting of LA doesn’t remotely reflect the authenticity of the city but rather the bright, glossy version that tends to be more offputting than appealing.

The dialogue is so “try-hard” it’s enough to make a person cringe, and the Entertainment Law avenue, thus far, hasn’t proven to be nearly as interesting.

Corporate law is cutthroat and raises many ethical and moral questions and complications, resulting in intriguing conflicts.

Making a Play - Suits
(Ian Watson/USA Network)

You either cared enough about the characters that you wanted them to “win” or weren’t invested enough in the concept of corporate law and what was at stake.

That made it easy viewing in which you may or may not have derived some pleasure in watching a bunch of rich people crumble and burn or screw over other rich people.

However, Entertainment law doesn’t have that same level of interest or high stakes. If we wanted to come remotely close to fashionable, hot lawyers navigating Los Angeles in intriguing ways, we have The Lincoln Lawyer.

But with Suits LA, there’s zero investment in what’s at stake for any of these characters or their clientele.

It also didn’t help that they never bothered to build up any of the characters much. Instead, it felt like they dropped us into a huge plot conflict mid-series and expected us to pick a side or feel something.

Stephen Amell as Ted Black
(David Astorga/NBC)

At the heart of Suits was its characters and their ability to resonate with viewers somehow.

But Suits LA doesn’t have that, and it never will for as long as they have their characters traipsing around trying to cosplay versions of Harvey, Donna, or whomever else.

So, in the end, Suits LA can attempt to lure in as many original Suits characters as possible, but it won’t benefit the series.

We know Gabriel Macht will suit up for another stint as the incomparable (and I mean that) Harvey Specter. That may convince a few people to tune in long enough to see the character again for nostalgia.

Harvey Wants the Truth - Suits Season 9 Episode 1
(Ian Watson/USA Network)

And LA is about to get Litt Up when Rick Hoffman will also make a cameo down the road.

But these cameos aren’t enough to save Suits LA. They’re only emblematic of what’s hindering the series most — painfully, desperately trying to merge these two series when it simply doesn’t work.

If Suits LA has a shot of surviving the bloodbath of cancellations that are often on the horizon as the network whittles away at its lineup, it needs to steer clear of the Suits franchise spiel rather than clumsily faceplanting into it.

Until Suits LA can find an identity of its own rather than attempting to be a poor man’s Suits, The Lincoln Lawyer, The Good Wife, or LA Law, it won’t matter if they summon the entire Suits lineup Avengers-style to pass a literal torch; it won’t save it.

Over to you, take our poll and hit the comments with your thoughts.

Should Suits: LA Break Away from Trying to Be Suits?
×

Watch Suits LA Online

TV Fanatic is searching for passionate writers to share their voices across various article types. Think you have what it takes to be a TV Fanatic? Click here for more information and next steps.

Nathan

Thursday 13th of March 2025

How do you write a whole article about why Suits was successful and ignore Mike?! Mike and Harvey's relationship *was* the show and that's the main reason this reboot doesn't work. That and the fact that Stephen Amell is totally charmless.

Sweet Amy

Saturday 15th of March 2025

@Jasmine Blu, speaking of Robbie, any idea if we will ever be getting the final season of Upload?

Jasmine Blu

Friday 14th of March 2025

@Christophe, When I wrote about how he lacked charisma, I specifically mentioned that his cousin could have pulled off a charismatic Suits role so much better. Amell may be many things, but I just don't associate him with charm or charisma. Robbie, though? Definitely.

Christophe

Friday 14th of March 2025

@Nathan,

Charmless, stale, etc... Everytime he says the word city I have Arrow flashbacks and that also tarnishes this show. There's a talented actor in the Amell family and it definitely ain't Stephen!

Jasmine Blu

Thursday 13th of March 2025

You got me there!

To be fair, we already had an article about that Can Suits LA Succeed Without a Compelling Suits-Like Hook?

LOL. And we kinda already covered the Amell bit, too, though some of my colleagues would disagree on that one.

Tbookfan

Thursday 13th of March 2025

I like the show. I had no preconceived notions concerning the original Suits. We all knew that the original cast was not joining this show; therefore I'm not sure what people expected concerning Suits LA v.s. Suits.

Every show needs a few episodes to flesh out the characters and for the audience to get to know those characters. The flashbacks are being used to help the audience get to know the core group from NY. We still don't know what caused the present day fractures, but that will come in time if the show is not canceled.

I wish the show had a different title, and then maybe the audience would give it a chance.

Jasmine Blu

Thursday 13th of March 2025

@Tbookfan, I kinda wish they had stuck to the original cast not joining or appearing on the series. Now, they're trying to rack up as many cameos as they can score, presumably. We have both Harvey and Louis coming in. It seems like they they thought it would make things better, and they were likely trying to appease the OG Suits crowd, but it's making it worse, IMO.

I think starting the series with one of its biggest conflicts in the first episode was a bit rough. We were expected to care about this sinking ship firm and this fracture before we even knew everyone's names.

You're kind of making my point. I think they saw dollar signs and a sure thing when they figured they could slap "Suits" on it, but it's backfiring a bit. They didn't actually make a Suits spinoff. They had a show concept already in the works and slapped "Suits: LA" on it and tweaked it to be like Suits, in doing so, all they did was invite too much comparison.

I would love to know what the series could've been like if they didn't try so hard to tie it to Suits.

Ines

Thursday 13th of March 2025

Sorry to say that, but the article is just another article that somehow wants to try to cancel the show... I am so tired of reading those one sided things, this is not journalism to me.

Also I have to disagree. I don't think Suits LA is trying to be Suits. Aside from the intro and a few other things, I don't see much similar things. It is a darker show, it has more drama. It tried to do something different at the beginning and intentionally didn't throw us immediately into the sexy law world. Instead they decided to try it differently. I totally get that some things are not done perfectly in the show and that its missing the strong characters that Suits had, but this is what time is for. It's been three episodes and everybody acts like it's been already a season. It's sad.

Jasmine Blu

Friday 14th of March 2025

@Sweet Amy, The Eddie angle was interesting, and like you, I was disappointed by that twist. Leah is the pro-bono lady, right? She's the only likable character to me.

I at least managed to get through Suits: LA, I couldn't even it make it through the first episode of Grosse Pointe Garden Society, and I wanted to like that one because of the Desperate Housewives/How to Get Away with Murder vibes.

I am so upset that Found doesn't get the ratings and love that it deserves! It's such a great show, and I'm constantly in awe of all the twists and turns and what they manage to do every episode to keep the momentum going. I need so much more of that series, so I'll be heartbroken if it doesn't move forward -- same with Brilliant Minds. It's in my top three faves of the medical dramas that have come out this season.

I miss Macht, too.

Sweet Amy

Friday 14th of March 2025

@Jasmine Blu, I was a massive fan of Suits, but Suits: LA is just so-so for me currently. I do like it better than Grosse Pointe though. I really liked Ted's brother, Eddie, and the dynamic they had, but was disappointed when the 1st episode showed us that Eddie is nothing more than a ghost. I think that the writers made a mistake. Even though we don't truly know the characters yet, I do not like Stuart. Out of all the characters, I really like ghost Eddie, and Leah the most. Besides the things you have already highlighted, I think the show should have changed the intro music from the original, like Law and Order does with it's intros. I really like Stephen Amell, but he and this show may not make the cut for another season, given how little time they have to prove themselves via the ratings. I don't feel as negatively towards the show as you do, but I would much prefer to have Found and Brilliant Minds renewed, versus Suits: LA and Grosse Pointe. I am truly saddened that Found isn't doing better in the ratings. Whatever the future holds for Suits: LA, I will look forward to seeing Gabriel Macht on something other than just the T-Mobile ads with Patrick J. Adams. I miss him being on a TV show, but I know he is making his family his #1 priority these days, and I do applaud him for that.

Jasmine Blu

Thursday 13th of March 2025

@Ines, I'm not trying to cancel the show. I don't have that kind of power in the first place. If anything, I explained what the series could do to actually avoid impending cancelation. Unfortunately, the ratings aren't so hot, and it's a blood bath out there with networks figuring out which of their currently airing shows they'll keep and which they'll cull to make room for their new content.

I enjoy a lot of series on NBC, so when it comes down to it, if I'm rating what we currently have and what I'm willing to lose versus keep, I'd definitely sacrifice Suits: LA (and Grosse Point Society) for Brilliant Minds and Found.

My issue is that they're trying to capitalize off of Suits popularity by calling this a spinoff and that invites comparisons that it simply cannot live up to in the first place. Originally, this wasn't even supposed to be a "spinoff." They chose to slap the Suits name on it and make these tie-ins on a series that they were still baking up and then rushed to put it out there because they wanted to cash in on Suits' Renaissance and popularity.

It wasn't ready to be out there and shouldn't have been, and knowing that it wasn't even originally a Suits concept, it was an afterthought makes it worse. Unfortunately, in this climate and industry, you have to make a great impact quickly, because networks can't afford it otherwise.

I do agree with you and often wish that they gave shows more time these days, sadly, it's not the reality. But that's why I think tying this to a beloved series like Suits (especially when it's been recently popular) set the show up for failure. I wonder if it could've been something if they just allowed it be a series about Hollywood management and PR (which was the original concept before they changed it to fit Suits).

I'm glad you're loving the series, though. I'm sorry you don't like the article.

Ines

Thursday 13th of March 2025

@Carissa Pavlica, I mean it's totally ok to not like something or a show for sure and to discuss it. But I just think it's been horrible towards everyone involved with the show to get those articles all over the place. It feels like one big campaign .. One should not forget that there are actual people working there, that worked hard. And therefore I found it not pretty objective and very repetitive that some pages won't stop trashing on the show (including this one). But yeah, just my two cents :)

I would love to learn more about the show and the characters and I actually like the flashbacks. Especially those from the last episode.

Carissa Pavlica

Thursday 13th of March 2025

When high expectations aren't met for a new show, this is the result. There are tremendous advantages for studios to use IP they own, but there are even more risks. If a show is beloved and you come out of the gate with subpar programming, you need to expect to be pulled aside for a chat. I'm glad you are enjoying it. I tried, but after three episodes, I was so confused by the thinly veiled flashbacks I had no idea what was going on. I'm sure I'm not alone.

Sharing is Caring

Help spread the word. You're awesome for doing it!